unown · HackerTrans

hace 6 añosdiscuss

Perhaps because the Chinese company "Fosun Pharmaceutical", as the other sponsor[1] of this vaccine, is the one which has the right to distribute it in China?

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BNT162b2#Funding

unown

hace 6 añosdiscuss

> every source stated it man.

Of course every Indian source stated that India were on the side of justice, just like Chinese media also gave a bias in favor of China. The thing is, there's no way to know which side is telling the truth. None of their sources can be considered credible on this.

You can try keeping only the "facts" as described by the Indian media in the corresponding Wikipedia entry[1] and see if others agree. My point is: You can't just assert that a unilateral statement is a fact.

> They captured few villages from neighboring country Nepal

"Nepal government says Nepal doesn't have border dispute with China"[2]

"Nepal denies claims of construction by Chinese side within its territory"[3]

Your news sources don't look that credible.

In fact, not only are there no disputes between Nepal and China, but instead there are disputes between Nepal and India.[4]

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_China%E2%80%93India_skirm...

[2]: https://reddit.com/r/Nepal/comments/iybcbj/nepal_government_...

[3]: https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/nepal-denies-claims-of-c...

[4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93Nepal_border#Bor...

unown

hace 6 añosdiscuss

1. There is no clear evidence as to which side initiated that conflict.

2. There were casualties on both sides. “Chinese soldiers kill our people“ You made it sound like Chinese soldiers killed civilians. Do you have any credible sources to back up your claim?

unown

hace 6 añosdiscuss

Could you elaborate more and provide some examples? Personally I didn’t find any known streamers approved of cheating, and the mainstream absolute hate cheaters.

unown

hace 6 añosdiscuss

I have tried what you suggested. Granting "Developer Tools" access definitely FIXED THIS ISSUE for the specific application.

Here is the new result (I only run once for each case):

    ╒══════════╤═════════════╤═══════════════════════════╕
    │          │             │ +"Developer Tools" access │
    ╞══════════╪═════════════╪═══════════════════════════╡
    │ terminal │ 1.448/0.004 │ 0.016/0.004               │
    ├──────────┼─────────────┼───────────────────────────┤
    │ iTerm2   │ 1.240/0.006 │ 0.024/0.007               │
    ╘══════════╧═════════════╧═══════════════════════════╛

`1.448/0.004` means the first time it is `1.448 total`, and the second time it is `0.004 total`.

(It seems I have "good" VPN/internet connection condition at this time)

unown

hace 6 añosdiscuss

HN has been blocked in China since about 9 months ago.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20676573

unown

hace 6 añosdiscuss

As someone living in China, this is my result when I connected to my VPN (this is my normal life, thus I can visit sites like HN):

> Hello

> /tmp/test.sh 0.00s user 0.00s system 0% cpu 5.746 total

> Hello

> /tmp/test.sh 0.00s user 0.00s system 79% cpu 0.006 total

And even if I didn't connect to my VPN:

> Hello

> /tmp/test2.sh 0.00s user 0.00s system 0% cpu 1.936 total

> Hello

> /tmp/test2.sh 0.00s user 0.00s system 78% cpu 0.005 total

That's just ridiculous and unbearable.

Apple should provide a way to disable this notarization thing, and the user should still be able to enable SIP while disabling it.

additional information:

- macOS version: 10.15.4

- terminal: iTerm2 3.3.9

- didn't install any "security" software