HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

whyever

no profile record

comments

whyever
·hace 2 meses·discuss
There was Quelle, Europe's largest mail-order and retail company. They were excited about mailing their catalogue on CD-ROM, but slept on the Internet. In 2009, they went bankrupt.
whyever
·hace 3 meses·discuss
LLMs are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, so I'm not sure they are in advantage.
whyever
·hace 8 meses·discuss
Note that N=1 for the memory safety vulnerabilities they had with Rust, so the error of the estimated average number of vulnerabilities per LOC is quite large.
whyever
·hace 8 meses·discuss
It's missing which point?
whyever
·hace 9 meses·discuss
I agree, but https://www.pcg-random.org/ still advertizes PCG as "challenging" to predict, and critizises other RNGs as predictable and insecure.
whyever
·hace 10 meses·discuss
Yes, but this relation does but apply to statistical mechanics and statistical physics, they mean the same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_mechanics

What is included in "statistical physics" that is not included in "statistical mechanics"?
whyever
·hace 10 meses·discuss
They are synonyms.
whyever
·hace 10 meses·discuss
Signal asks you to repeat the key immediately before even enabling backups. It cannot fail much later unless you modify the digit after the check.
whyever
·hace 10 meses·discuss
That's a good question! Especially after Frank McSherry's COST paper [1], it's hard to imagine where the sweet spot for Spark is. I guess for Databricks it makes sense to push Spark, since they are the ones who created it. In a way, it's their competitive advantage.

[1]: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/hotos15/hotos...
whyever
·hace 11 meses·discuss
> With that access you can also "do" things, like sending messages or delete stuff.

If you break E2E encryption, you can likely also impersonate and "do" things.
whyever
·hace 11 años·discuss
In Python you basically get undefined behavior when encountering NaNs while sorting, Rust let's you choose. This seems much more reasonable to me.
whyever
·hace 11 años·discuss
Rust's way is more flexible though: You can choose how to treat NaNs, in Ruby you have to fail.