Your quotes over heuristics made my rational mind believe you’re full of it.
You are being rather certain for someone who has yet to show how they know for certain they aren’t simply engaging meaningless mechanical effort and grasping for clever semantics.
Do not dare suppose you know where others should find value.
Your subjective feelings as 1 in 7 billion are not universal truth.
Why are real world laws around moderation ok but online should be different? Does that communication not have a real world effect?
Yet another human pipe dream fed to the masses to empower corporations, rile the public up about government interference (never mind laws enable tech corp meddling in our lives; cognitive dissonance among smart people is a thing). And now you’re doing free political lobbying.
Understand, my freedom of speech is intact without the web. Probably even more so without technology watching me at work and home. For what? Turning my lights on and off with my voice?
ML applied to science and engineering are one thing. Filtering people with rough edge incomplete statistical tools (described as such by experts) is just awful on the surface of it.
Pretty sure what’s good for social stability is not giving up our agency to nation state political demands. Believing that society is too big to fail. Seems every time societies do that they die. The more people it pushes aside the less internal support it has.
Book publishers and magazines aren’t held to a very serious standard these days.
This isn’t the UK; free speech in the US is number 1.
It’s far more fundamental than any legislation will fix. America is built on aristocratic protectionism like every other nation. Things like the Constitution allowing for copyright protection for a limited time is made effectively forever given the perspective of an average human life span.
It will always end up being gamed.
Personally, I’m tuning out more from consumerism and “the tech industry”. Even before covid I’d grown sick of what became circular debates over big O and comp sci 101 in tech, and routine office life.
I’m learning musical instruments and writing creatively. Ditched my TV. Things like 230 are useful for big tech Corp. Not me. Let them defend it. I’m not interested in performing unpaid political lobbying for them.
“I wrote a book on how PM is hard. It starts by hiring the right people. Of course, I wrote a book detailing how all the people involved at scale keep screwing it up. Buy my book.”
This a circular advertisement for a book.
I am guessing it’s more to with how most organize socially for human emotional reasons first and tacitly don’t give a shit about ephemeral nonsense except to play “Society: The Board Game”.
Politicking intended to send a message to Georgia: the House is willing. Are you?
For game players, the tech scene sure is anti-politics. Somehow all those smarts are lost on the fact these folks are manipulating your free market giving billions for free to entrenched employers.
Social life is nothing but political choices; rather than engage the government we are told to engage the middle men they fund.
You are being rather certain for someone who has yet to show how they know for certain they aren’t simply engaging meaningless mechanical effort and grasping for clever semantics.