I also not that supposed "fact check" contains a flat out lie;
They first say;
"false claims about the WEF have been conflated with conspiracy theories about the United Nation’s ‘Agenda 30’ framework"
then later on their "debunking" itself falsely conflates the WEF with the UN Agenda 2030, saying;
"False. The World Economic Forum does not have a stated goal to have people ‘own nothing and be happy’ by 2030. Its Agenda 2030 framework outlines an aim to ensure all people have access to ownership and control over land and other forms of property."
They claim the "proof" that the WEF is not promoting the "own nothing" society is that "their" Agenda 2030 framework promotes property ownership, but it isn't "theirs" at all, it's the UN's. They literally do the same thing to rebut claims about the WEF that they accused the "conspiracy theorists" of.
Yeah, weirdly this ludicrous standard is never applied to leftist politics, for example suggesting that any criticism of inequality could "escalate" into the Holodomor or the Killing Fields of Cambodia, so therefore its important not to "normalize" such behaviour.
It's not 1960 lol, there are not vast swathes of the country where that happens, since the liberal left has almost total control via the Federal bureaucracy for enforcing their values everywhere, not just in blue states
Yeah, the old "white" men who run Hollywood, record labels and the news media.
Oh wait, is that anti-Semitic to say? Then was it anti-white of you to say?
Also being cancelled for opposing a war that was engineered by globalist neocons is not proof that the interests of white males used to be the basis for cancelling people lol.
And there's nothing "democratic" about this lol, the cancelling is still done to suit the interests of those "white" people who run these organisations. No one cares if some people don't want to buy some tickets to a show, they care when Mastercard and Visa have secret blacklists of anyone to the right of Mitt Romney that they don't allow to transact on their monopoly global financial network.
They can't practically do that, you're just making up a course of events that can't happen (people can develop things anonymously and be paid anonymously, and it's absolute nonsense to say that governments are going to be arresting the general public for the "crime" of privacy.
And in America at least it's almost certainly unconstitutional.
They first say;
"false claims about the WEF have been conflated with conspiracy theories about the United Nation’s ‘Agenda 30’ framework"
then later on their "debunking" itself falsely conflates the WEF with the UN Agenda 2030, saying;
"False. The World Economic Forum does not have a stated goal to have people ‘own nothing and be happy’ by 2030. Its Agenda 2030 framework outlines an aim to ensure all people have access to ownership and control over land and other forms of property."
They claim the "proof" that the WEF is not promoting the "own nothing" society is that "their" Agenda 2030 framework promotes property ownership, but it isn't "theirs" at all, it's the UN's. They literally do the same thing to rebut claims about the WEF that they accused the "conspiracy theorists" of.