U.S. Indicts CEO of Encrypted Phone Firm 'Sky'(vice.com)
vice.com
U.S. Indicts CEO of Encrypted Phone Firm 'Sky'
https://www.vice.com/en/article/4adzdj/sky-secure-global-indictment
1 comments
Am I missing something here? Is there specific evidence showing that sky intended its service to be used by criminals? If not this should be very worrying. A company offering secure 1 to 1 communication shouldnt be liable for what that content is. From my understanding this has nothing to do with content in the public space. What is the difference to something like signal, or telegram?