>Chapelle has an outdated view of trans issues but doesn’t call for violence, which is Netflix’s line.
Chapelle has a logically correct view of trans issues that's up to date. It's probably the view shared by a silent majority but it's politically suicide to even hint at, as he covered in his special. You can rob a pregnant woman at gun point and be considered a saint, but if you hurt a trans person's feelings, you're literally Hitler.
>Are you aware of the requirements needed to be a licensed, bonded electrician?
Yes. I'm also aware of their average income in the Bay Area, and it absolutely did not justify the price.
>Also, most electricians make more money doing new construction, especially condo or apartment buildings.
Barely any of that in the Bay Area.
>I can guarantee they just didn't think your project was important or worth it (and they're right). They see someone who can afford an electric car, and they know what it's worth to you to charge it.
Market is white hot for them, not going to lie.
>But hey, you could always just google it, do it yourself and hope the inspector doesn't notice. What's the worst that could happen?
Not where I live, need a city permit and a licensed installer. I'm leasing so that's what the home owner requires.
"Since they were racist in the past, we get to be racist NOW!" At least you admit you're not morally against racism, you're quite for it, just targeting Whites is perfectly OK.
>You might think it's unfair
There's no "think", it is logically and factually racist, unfair.
The reason why you're seeing this more and more is because White liberals are the only self-hating subgroup [0].
"Remarkably, white liberals were the only subgroup exhibiting a pro-outgroup bias—meaning white liberals were more favorable toward nonwhites and are the only group to show this preference for group other than their own. Indeed, on average, white liberals rated ethnic and racial minority groups 13 points (or half a standard deviation) warmer than whites."
Installing an EV charger (which are supposed to be installed in every new house built in California) versus consulting fees for an enterprise software build out are not apples and oranges, it's apples and horses.
We need more electricians as well. Got a quote to add a car charger last week and it was a hilarious four figure sum, with a month and a half lead time.
>I see nothing wrong with this proposal (I mean, I proposed it, right?).
No problem with denying illegal immigrants student IDs because they have to be at the same standards required for other voting IDs? Awesome, glad we agree.
>Illegal immigrants going to CC wishing to pay resident rates will have to prove their residency just like everyone else, as is the current situation.
Correct, except now they'll have to prove lawful presence, and residency if they are to be the same standard as other voter IDs. They can't prove lawful presence because they immigrated illegally, so my point stands.
>I don't see an issue with that. Do you?
Not at all! Tax money for citizens and legal immigrants should absolutely not go to illegal immigrants. No issues here, glad we agree.
>Which is fraud and can be detected and caught easily.
Apparently not. There are hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants defrauding the government by using other's social security numbers, etc. and it's been tough to stop it.
>If legislatures wanted to fortify the requirements to make them more uniform across counties they could have. They didn't. And it's telling.
They did... What are you talking about? This is a state standard that is the same across all counties. It's telling that you have absolutely no clue here.
>Shot down?
Yes, national IDs, voter ID laws are continuously shot down by Democrats, or are tampered in committees etc.
>You mean free as long as their time is worthless, right?
Just like voting, buying a gun, etc. It's not 100% free in time to exercise your rights.
>Because they already have an ID that should qualify,
Except they don't, as I have laid out above. Student IDs are not valid practically anywhere for identification such as airplanes, bars, buying alcohol, purchasing firearms, etc.
>but doesn't because of "reasons"
Yes, "reasons", also known as "uncomfortable facts that go against the narrative."
>Where those reasons are vague and unsupported by fact and evidence.
Those reasons are well defined and support by facts, logic, and evidence.
>After all, we have no evidence so far to support the idea that students are committing widespread voter fraud.
Thankfully because they're not allowed to use their student IDs, glad we're treating them like normal citizens.
>Republicans can't seem prove such a thing is happening despite decades of searching for it (gee, maybe because it's not happening).
Cool, same how there haven't been illegal weapons purchases with student IDs because they're not allowed for that either. Glad the Republicans are being consistent.
Chapelle has a logically correct view of trans issues that's up to date. It's probably the view shared by a silent majority but it's politically suicide to even hint at, as he covered in his special. You can rob a pregnant woman at gun point and be considered a saint, but if you hurt a trans person's feelings, you're literally Hitler.