HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

5701652400

118 karmajoined il y a 6 mois

Submissions

Alibaba bans Claude Code as a security risk

scmp.com
3 points·by 5701652400·il y a 8 jours·1 comments

GitHub DMCA Repository

github.com
4 points·by 5701652400·il y a 22 jours·1 comments

GitHub Copilot Pricing Change

github.com
1 points·by 5701652400·le mois dernier·1 comments

comments

5701652400
·il y a 10 heures·discuss
same here. API access + low price is why I am using Chinese models
5701652400
·il y a 10 heures·discuss
no analysis. only based what I see in VSCode tool calls.
5701652400
·il y a 10 heures·discuss
my point is: any talk of "freedom" when you are a corporate slave or living on government handouts is nonsense

it is all wannabe lemon-stand freedom.
5701652400
·il y a 12 heures·discuss
using them in VSCode all the time for months now. Qwen from Alibaba Cloud, Deepseek from deepseek.com. none of them upload entirety of codebase or even attempt to.

in fact, opposite. Chinese AI seem to post-process heaviliy locally.

they are always using head / tail, grep, sed, and do as much as they can locally and extrac meaningful data and send home (AI inference chunks). only what is really needed.

it is actually hard to force Chinese AI modesl to read full files, they really do not want to see them. even 400 lines files, is usally hit first for first line, first 50 lines. and at most 200 lines chunk reads, and give up at one or two reads.
5701652400
·il y a 12 heures·discuss
exactly. looks like this is what they doing
5701652400
·il y a 12 heures·discuss
there is difference between:

A) leaking structured fully working complete set of files (full working recipe) that is not relevant to AI queries at all.

B) adhoc random queries, bits and pieces, grep of chunks of random files and local bash post-processing for AI queries at hand. which is hard to use for anyting anyways, and will end up in just corups of trainig data (CommonCrawl quality — meaning, not good). (not full recipe).
5701652400
·il y a 12 heures·discuss
key point: Grok is not even using the files they upload.

they send home entirety of codebase that they do not even use for user AI queries.

and why use cloud AI for coding? how is this even a question in 2026? if you don't, you can't compete with somone who does use it.
5701652400
·il y a 12 heures·discuss
they are literally going after "creating everything app" and "everything business" (macrohard).

they are litearlly ingesting and integrating your app/business into theirs.
5701652400
·il y a 12 heures·discuss
will this endup in their "macrohard" (automate any business) project?

will this endup in their "everything app"?

guess you do not need to build "everything" yourself, when you can steal it.
5701652400
·il y a 12 heures·discuss
more like it allows them to steal your trade secrets, app designs, internal business knowledge, or even just replicate whatever code/app/tool/process you had.

what was your private code, becomes their code now.
5701652400
·il y a 12 heures·discuss
haha so they just stealing entire codebases?
5701652400
·il y a 20 heures·discuss
so 2027 was supposed to be singulariy? lol
5701652400
·il y a 20 heures·discuss
+1 this 2027/2040 AI articles are devoid of real-world practical economic/finance thinking. nor even human psychology.
5701652400
·il y a 20 heures·discuss
start first with securing your own food without govenrment nor employer.

then start talking about freedom.
5701652400
·hier·discuss
on the other hand, you start distinguishing the pipe from the image of a "the pipe".
5701652400
·hier·discuss
"just get divident from govenment"

almost nothing about how wealth is distributed. hard to believe richest, greediest, most corrupt people will just gave away money to everyone.

start by opening borders. see how that goes.

not gonna happen.
5701652400
·hier·discuss
AI yearly plans got particulalry hasrsh treatment. per official GitHub Blogs and policies, they penalized specifically yearly plans with 50x ~ 100x multipliers on 2026-06-01.

and yearly plans were given options by GitHub: A) leave and get pro-rata refund; 2) switch to new plan.

so what is the point of yearly plans when GitHub can unilatrerally change conditions of your plan? or force you to leave? what is the point of agreement if I can change it later or say "no agreement".
5701652400
·hier·discuss
+1 usually a sign of midwit and mediocrity. not once I seen "first principles" blogs have any value.
5701652400
·il y a 3 jours·discuss
+ predatory pricing hikes for AI

+ not honouring yearly commitments plans
5701652400
·il y a 6 jours·discuss
what does "runs" actually mean? zoom calls from his private Hawai island to a bunch of buddies other C-level execs?