Was your mother a late bilingual? From this paper [1], we know that for late bilinguals, regions for each language are spatially separated in Broca's area. Broca's area is responsible for speaking, while language understanding is attributed to Wernicke's area*. It's possible that the stroke affected only the part of the Broca's region responsible for English speaking. And since language understanding is handled by another region, it wasn't affected.
*For completeness, according to current neurolinguistic models it's more complex than that, more brain regions are actually responsible for speech/understanding.
Yeah, makes sense that it's popular. I just thought you were making a joke by creating a similar looking issue with a different underlying reason.
In Go example the issue happens because item variable is per-loop, in your python example the issue is not related to loops at all, it's just because functions capture the value of global variables at execution time.
And the cherry on top is that the solution is also similar looking(i=i), but working with a different mechanic underneath(default argument assignment).
Anyway, this was my perspective that led me to interpret this as satire. A bit disappointed haha
Ask the caller to move their hand in front of the camera so the hand fully obstructs the view, and then slowly slide the hand to the side until it completely moves out of the view. Crop-resistant!
Papers say that both are trained on PDB dataset. And still, we see a dramatic gap between old and new Alphafold models. Both were trained by Deepmind, probably with a similar computer power. I think it's obvious that it's not just compute power, method matters a lot.
Thanks for the example. Could you point me to a resource where it explains why the reality is like that? If that’s an implication of a formula of quantum theory(which the article also mentioned briefly), I would like to learn about it and be able to derive this implication myself.
This kind of magnetic sensitivity seems to be dependent on receiving light, because the sensitive molecules form the radical pairs when exposed to light. With this information, evolving within the eye scenario sounds plausible to me.
I also thought about just using search. But trending topics let me know if something important is happening when I'm not aware. I still think it's valuable at times, while I also think it may be spammy and should be improved.
I think its low signal to noise ratio makes you ignore it, which is bad. But I think instead of just removing it, spams should be prevented more effectively. Because I know "trending" concept is useful when it works. HN, Reddit and some other aggregator sites have homepages with trending content, of course with varying degree of success.
I don't use trending topics in ordinary days. It helps me a lot when something important happened recently.
An important political speech, a big earthquake, bombing... For this kind of situations, Twitter trending topics help a lot, because it provides you the most up-to-date source of news.
When critical situations happen, your priority is getting the news live. Correctness, officialness are less important. I don't know a better way to get that kind of news other than trending topics.
Prevent your success from spoiling your kids. Your kids probably are not jealous of anything they see because you provide them anything they want. I think a parent should think and figure out how to create a challenging environment for their kids. Not just artificial challenge like games. Real challenge that will shape(and I think improve) their personality.
I'm not a parent so I can't give concrete advise, just sharing my thoughts.
*For completeness, according to current neurolinguistic models it's more complex than that, more brain regions are actually responsible for speech/understanding.
[1] http://www.nature.com/articles/40623