I assume the reason for this is because its cooked and its taking into account water content but it feels unintuitive. Also it then doesnt tell me specifically how much carbs/fat there is, just a percentage. If people are going to use this for quick checks for specific diets it won't be all that useful.
In fact it's probably worth just using the percentages for the colour bars and only having pure values in grams shown as numbers. You could add a toggle to show percentages so that people planning a days worth of food could have a percentage split for their macros.
Aside from this I love this idea and the way its presented and would definitely use it if it had enough information.
Forgive my ignorance but what exactly do you mean by Uber for Unions, I'm not seeing the link between an on-demand service platform and the mass organisation of a workforce?
Then perhaps you could elaborate on the sentence, seeing as the thread is about helping the learning process of a sysadmin. Posting something that only someone experienced in it would "understand" is entirely unhelpful and the likely reason for any down votes.
I put in ESET at a previous organisation I worked at and was actually amazed at how easy and straightforward it was to install and manage (simultaneously on Macs and PCs).
In London it is popular because it is the cheapest form of taxi and in many cases quite significantly without sacrificing any convenience and in many cases adding much more convenience.
> the ability to hide stories you've already read (some box to tick like a todo list) or are not interested in. They take up so much space, so there is a lot of wasted space after 5 mins on the site and reading/seeing I'm not interested in the top stories. I don't want to click 'show more', I want new headlines to replace old unwanted headlines
This is a feature I'd love in the current site as well
I would be interested to see the numbers behind the case for always deploying to iPhones first, especially around the point made on rich people having iPhones and poor people not having them.
I assume the reason for this is because its cooked and its taking into account water content but it feels unintuitive. Also it then doesnt tell me specifically how much carbs/fat there is, just a percentage. If people are going to use this for quick checks for specific diets it won't be all that useful.
In fact it's probably worth just using the percentages for the colour bars and only having pure values in grams shown as numbers. You could add a toggle to show percentages so that people planning a days worth of food could have a percentage split for their macros.
Aside from this I love this idea and the way its presented and would definitely use it if it had enough information.