actually, my argument is against digital rights management meaning digital exclusive property
I'm aware that's a bit of a leap to get from "lowering quality" to "drm sucks and is a terrible idea", but as I see things, drm defeats the purpose of having an internet
and it is an even bigger jump (at least 16-bits? ahaha) to understand the connection between twich and south korea (who pays for the bits?)
it's remarkable how you critizice my 'lack of perspective', because your comment requires that I narrow my perspective enought that I can fill in the gaps in my own opinion such a way that you get what I'm trying to say
funny how one "the" flips the meaning of the sentence
I thought I was being paranoid until I started reading the article
I choose to believe this is a freudian slip, which means they're trying to cause tooth decay while pretending to do the opposite.
If I were dentistry as a business, I wouldn't like this permanent (final) solution to tooth decay because of my unreasonably suspicions that the odontological treatment I received as a child was unconsciously intended to make me continue to need 'dental care' instead of fixing anything. Last time I was at a (very expensive private) dental clinic the treatment they pushed on to me was killing my tooth so I would buy one. I'm pretty sure some hugely powerful branch of dentistry is betting on people in my demographic (who get their teeth killed off) buying a full set of teeth from them in the future.
But I would only accept Thompson teeth, the only teeth capable of chewing other teeth
what I actually think is way crazier than that. if you asked me (which you didn't) I'd say that I think that behind the scenes what all these llm and ai companies are doing is licensing chinese tech
i regard the timing for the openai fiasco right after the apec meeting in sf as too good for this all to be true
my argument is more philosophical than scientific, so I can offer no evidence
time is asymmetric BY definition. if time weren't asymmetric I would have to call it space instead.
(seems like I'm using asymmetry and monotonicity as synonyms)
in my definition, passing is all time can ever do, and it must do it only in the 'same direction'.
finally, in my view it is space which enables backwards and forwards motion.
for a while I've been counfounded by the connection between "they're really smart, they do great quality work" and the simple fact that maybe, they just spent way more time doing the work