HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

PittleyDunkin

no profile record

comments

PittleyDunkin
·l’année dernière·discuss
China is not a geopolitical adversary to me. Why would I want to beef with China when China has never done anything to treat me poorly?
PittleyDunkin
·l’année dernière·discuss
> To be fair, OpenAI's products are not really models, they are... products

What's the distinction? What kind of functionality do they offer that other models don't?
PittleyDunkin
·l’année dernière·discuss
> It’s odd that MS is releasing models they are competitors to OA.

> I think the strategy is now offer cheap and performant infra to run the models.

Is this not what microsoft is doing? What can microsoft possibly lose by releasing a model?
PittleyDunkin
·il y a 2 ans·discuss
> Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is generally not considered to be reality.

This is true only in the strictest terms of the hypothesis, i.e. linguistic determinism. Language still encodes a lot of culture (& hence norms and values) in its grammar & diction—this isn't very controversial.

Granted, I don't think this is that related to the topic at hand. There's bias all over the decisions in how to train and what to train on; choice of language is just one facet of that.
PittleyDunkin
·il y a 2 ans·discuss
I assumed that this was intentionally a signal that you shouldn't take this too seriously and a reference to this Simpsons clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYAuR5bkIlQ
PittleyDunkin
·il y a 2 ans·discuss
Hey at least this way other languages can use it
PittleyDunkin
·il y a 2 ans·discuss
You'd think they'd include a term that signaled this is about vectors then! I foolishly assumed this was a new term for "orthogonal", but words don't really need to be meaningfully related to their roots to be meaningful themselves.
PittleyDunkin
·il y a 2 ans·discuss
Parellelism doesn't imply directionism at all.
PittleyDunkin
·il y a 2 ans·discuss
Such definitions may not make sense but it's still worth accepting them.
PittleyDunkin
·il y a 2 ans·discuss
> This is a good 'pointing-fingers' i-told-you-so kind of bureaucracy.

Maybe there's just nothing actionable for the readers? That's certainly most situations.
PittleyDunkin
·il y a 2 ans·discuss
When did I mention the economy?
PittleyDunkin
·il y a 2 ans·discuss
The US was never built to produce a cohesive nation on any level outside of commerce and federal military. This is particularly visible today in terms of education.

There's an attitude here of "I'm gonna do the best for my family; fuck all other people". Such a culture isn't going to be globally competitive. The money machines have dried up and there's no obvious frontier remaining....