The argument from the parent posts rely on ACA being repealed already. If the ACA does get repealed then the above arguments hold but this hasn't happened yet.
I think its more of the opposite. Technology creates spheres of influence in the countries that they operate. Traditional governments attempt to reign it in (this is usually effective if they are a company with ad revenue or they want to follow local laws. But when you cut down one sphere another grows to replace it.
It seems like right now "superhuman AI" is a buzzword that people like to use when they want to be covered by the press.
I'm surprised OpenAI didn't chime in. Physicists seem to use Aliens or multiple dimensions for this purpose (But some also use AI for the same effect).
It sort of distracts people from actually asking real questions like how to use AI / ML responsibly because the former doesn't require much to speculate about.
Its probably far easier to organize with your other shareholders to get that person fired. Suing is an option but you should probably try what I suggested in the mean time.
They have issued tagged with the bug report and adding more arguments to named tuple and to general functions seems to be the issue. The motivation for some of these changes were due to automatic code generation.
Also, Django 1.3 had issues with 255 arguments for named tuples.
To my knowledge there are no "AI Bots" that are involved in language design. Code generation is possible. Also solver aided languages See https://emina.github.io/rosette/
I think the iPad pro is more targeted for the kind of work that an executive does. Docking stations / plugging into any screens don't seem like something that has been well thought out and I don't think that Apple's strategy right now is to market to that kind of audience.
The social contract of open source is to give away code and time to open source to enhance the community and software. The problem that open source projects really have is that raising and or selling a product is a goal that not every person with a successful project has.
If you want to actually have people pay for open source you should look into making a grant style system for people in open source that is targeted to maintainers. Google Summer of Code and Aigrant are good examples of this.
Essential reminds me of Handspring who made palm PDA's with an expansion slot (which is what the essential technically has). I feel like its going to end up like Palm by folding back into Google.