HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

TSiege

1,798 karmajoined il y a 13 ans

Submissions

Iran War Cost Tracker

iran-cost-ticker.com
324 points·by TSiege·il y a 4 mois·446 comments

Nvidia Kicks Off the Next Generation of AI with Rubin

nvidianews.nvidia.com
55 points·by TSiege·il y a 6 mois·46 comments

comments

TSiege
·hier·discuss
I'm not sure the US would behave as rationally in that scenario as you hope
TSiege
·hier·discuss
This is not necessarily true. Yes the strait of hormuz is technically in their territorial waters, but it has been recognized as an international water way until recently. Every country with a port on the other side of the strait is going to lose access. This might not be a tolerable situation to those allies of ours and they also have the ability to force the war to drag on. Maybe we walk and pull out from our bases in those countries. maybe they suck it up and live with paying tolls. but maybe they bomb a port in iran and iran strikes a us base in response
TSiege
·il y a 4 jours·discuss
I never thought the chinese were giving away valuable technology out of kindness. I thought having them be free and open weight was part of a strategic move to undermine US tech dominance. I suppose if that was the case something has changed or maybe they simply didn't care until recently
TSiege
·il y a 4 jours·discuss
Sad to see this. They were the true disruptors to the space and gave the open source and home lab communities the opportunities to do things OpenAI and Anthropic would never allow. It also might have been the biggest factor in deflating the AI bubble we're in.
TSiege
·il y a 8 jours·discuss
"I love lax security features therefore you should too." Defaults should be safe and risky action should be done at the user's own discretion
TSiege
·il y a 10 jours·discuss
Very interesting! Thanks for sharing
TSiege
·il y a 10 jours·discuss
I'm not a biologist so I can't say for sure, but it seems like it would be a lot easier to edit an existing living organism to produce those products than it would be to create completely from scratch. We already do this with the process known as precision fermentation. We've gotten very good at editing genomes via CRISPR and related techniques and are only getting better

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_fermentation
TSiege
·il y a 12 jours·discuss
Everyone I know is griping about the cost of living. There is no easy answer, but the only viable solution is building a lot more dense housing and public transit for said urbanism. Housing being this expensive is a choice. The economy and our society would be much healthier if we decided making sure there was ample housing in high demand areas.

We've conflated having a home with a financial asset. We can't have plentiful affordable housing without decoupling this idea. Houses are a poor financial investment once you remove all the incentives involved like mortgage tax credits, fixed mortgage rates, and obstructive zoning rules. Buildings age and not productive assets and can only be a good financial investment if we deem having more of them is wrong. This will be a painful transition given most people's wealth is a single building they live in.
TSiege
·il y a 13 jours·discuss
Always worth a share for this scenario. It's not clear if LLMs are capable of doing actual analysis on medical imaging. For details see this article https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/frontier-models...

> As detailed in a new, yet-to-be-peer-reviewed paper, a team of researchers at Stanford University found that frontier AI models readily generated “detailed image descriptions and elaborate reasoning traces, including pathology-biased clinical findings, for images never provided.”

> In other words, the AI models happily came up with answers to questions about a supposedly accompanying image — even if the researchers never even showed it an image.

> As opposed to hallucinations, which involve AI models arbitrarily filling in the gaps within a logical framework, the team coined a new term for the phenomenon: “mirage reasoning.”

> The effect “involves constructing a false epistemic frame, i.e., describing a multi-modal input never provided by the user and basing the rest of the conversation on that, therefore changing the context of the task at hand,” the researchers wrote in their paper.

> The damning findings suggest AI models cheat by diving into the data they were given — and coming up with the rest based on probability, even if it’s almost entirely conjecture.
TSiege
·il y a 14 jours·discuss
Almost every major issue has bot networks from hostile countries playing both sides of any issue to intentionally cause chaos. I completely agree that russia, china, or some other country is fomenting anger here.

That and the other issues aside, I think AI companies have done this to themselves. They've gone around talking about replacing all human labor and becoming the companies that control robot god's that swallow the entire economy and put everyone out of work and might destroy man kind. Well saying that is gonna make people hate them and that will find an outlet somewhere
TSiege
·il y a 16 jours·discuss
I haven't heard of this happening, do you have links any explainers on this?
TSiege
·il y a 22 jours·discuss
I’m on mobile and that works for me sometimes but other times it just decides the district I’m working on is done and starts a new one. It’s not clear to me why or how to get that to not happen

Cool concept tho! Would like to play it if I could only understand how
TSiege
·il y a 24 jours·discuss
All I need to know is that it is actually owned by Elon Musk. A man who orchestrated DOGE that, beyond shutting down USAID and dooming millions to die[1], also stole American's social security information[2]. So why should I trust him with the source code to my business?

1: https://prospect.org/2026/05/22/who-died-when-elon-musk-kill... 2: https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/10/doge-employee-stole-social...
TSiege
·il y a 28 jours·discuss
It’s a personal hobby project why should we care this is how someone chooses to spend their free time and money? Lots of hobbies are expensive and pointless if you think of commercially available offerings. That’s why it’s a hobby and not a small business
TSiege
·le mois dernier·discuss
with this logic, why discuss any technology?
TSiege
·le mois dernier·discuss
it's a sarcasm loader
TSiege
·le mois dernier·discuss
lol this got me
TSiege
·le mois dernier·discuss
If Alphabet can afford it why are they issuing $80B in new shares for fresh capital?
TSiege
·le mois dernier·discuss
It's hard for me to see this being bigger than the great recession unless there's some vulnerabilities in the banking system we're not aware of. However, the amount of money that's being spent is going to demand a large return that I'm not sure will be made whole given the scale of investment in a time frame they want
TSiege
·le mois dernier·discuss
> And Google is a major shareholder in SpaceX, so they certainly have incentive to juice the valuation of the IPO.

Google own 5-6% of the shares of SpaceX. SpaceX is seeking a valuation of $1.77T which means Google's shares would be worth $88.5B-$106.2B. I'm not a skeptic of AI/LLMs but this makes me deeply suspicious of these circular deals. What happens when the music stops?