I have yet to see evidence that Wayland has less artifacts/tearing than X.
Wayland does not has such a thing: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Radeon-T...
Also Wayland probably has less support for adaptative sync (which is the biggest feature regarding what you call a perfect frame)
So non laggy screensharing is niche use case? Such statement does not make any sense to someone that live in the reality, especially since covid.
Wayland bring the risk of having critical bugs on compositor Y and critical missfeatures/missoptimizations.
Staying on X does not have any major user facing issue.
Therefore choosing to use Wayland right now is an irrational action which pros does not offset the cons.
Maybe that it'll make sense in the next 5 years, then I'd reconsider
Almost every months Microsoft make a more or less major gift to the open source community, this is beautiful.
They are the new "benevolent" Google and it's no surprise they're now the number one open source contributor of the world.
Responsible? What an hyperbolic statement.
Could you enlighten me on what would be the significant negative consequences?
I hope that your mental equation take into account the missed usefulness of GCC only attributes, flags and extensions by being clang compatible.
From Wikipedia
Authors, scientists, and physicians including Michael Shermer, Michael Ruse, Edzard Ernst, David Gorski, and Simon Singh have criticized anthroposophy's application in the areas of medicine, biology, agriculture, and education to be dangerous and pseudoscientific.[17][11][12][13] Others including former Waldorf pupil Dan Dugan and historian Geoffrey Ahern have criticized anthroposophy itself as a dangerous quasi-religious movement that is fundamentally anti-rational and anti-scientific.[14][15][16][17][18]
They are anti Vax, believe in "Lucifer" and their single source of truth come from Steiner "visions" aka hallucinations under psychedelics or more likely blatant lies.