TheoGone·il y a 11 mois·discussPart of it is the top LLM companies (OpenAI, Mistral) all copy and over train, often against e.g. Claude's or DeepSeek's TOS, on each other's models.
TheoGone·il y a 11 mois·discussPart of it is they all copy and over train, often against the TOS, on each other's models.
TheoGone·il y a 11 mois·discussLLMs are good at mimicking human intuition. Still sucks at deep thinking.LLMs PATTERN MATCH well. Good at "fast" System 1 thinking, instantly generating intuitive, fluent responses.LLMs are good at mimicking logic, not real reasoning. Simulate "slow," deliberate System 2 thinking when prompted to work step-by-step.The core of an LLM is not understanding but just predicting the next most word in a sequence.LLMs are good at both associative brainstorming (System 1) and creating works within a defined structure, like a poem (System 2).Reasoning is the Achilles heel rn. AN LLM's logic can SEEM plausible, it's based on CORRELATION, NOT deductive reasoning.