Yes I referenced the "most recognized and quoted artist from Latin America" and you think this is some sort of gotchya? I interpreted Botero's style into 10,000 cgi characters as mentioned many many times when speaking about the project.
Using a token to sell community art is not a Ponzi scheme. Selling digital assets? Not a Ponzi scheme.
If you don't know what the 'connect wallet' button does, you have never interacted with the Ethereum ecosystem. I suggest you look slightly beneath the surface as it's not nearly as black and white as the "Number Go Up" wants you to believe.
And yes, I very well may receive a cease and desist from McDonalds or Hot Pockets for using their logos in the corporate narrative of this fictional world.. you find this offensive?
Well you sound very angry. I didn't want to hijack another persons post to discuss an unrelated topic, but happy to discuss. I wasn't shilling anything I was sharing a procedural project related to this very post. These links are great for context on the tone of your reply, but say nothing of my project. As charming as Dan Olsen is (/s) there is a place in this world for digital scarcity, it's interesting, it's valid and even if 95% of the crypto ecosystem is cringe and scams, there are a lot of good people doing good work.
I don't know why you see it as any sort of ponzi.. it's just an experiment with digital assets, role-playing and world building. Involving money is a pyramid scheme? Perhaps not the thread to discuss. Guessing the reaction is because crypto is mainly grifters + money grabs.. and the cringey apes were the worst representatives.