HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

cagenut

no profile record

comments

cagenut
·il y a 15 jours·discuss
the downside is it allows us to continue to avoid solving the real problem

ideologues will tell you this is that all mankind suddenly lost their ability to exert self-discipline a few decades ago

science points to a broad combination of things like corn syrup and seed oils simply making food too addictivly-rewarding and calorie rich for our nervous and endocrine systems to handle.

so, do we reform the farm bill and fast food industries, or do we take the antidote?
cagenut
·il y a 2 mois·discuss
there are dozens of us!
cagenut
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
similar enough that i'll share, I think i learned this from an HN comment, you can put the code for a page in the url (with obvious limits):

this works as a "url" in both chrome and safari:

  data:text/html, <html contenteditable><head><title>notes</title></head><body><textarea rows=36 cols=140></textarea></body></html>
cagenut
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
honestly, look internally. after the plane from qatar. after the son-in-law's real estate dealings. after the visible-to-everyone kalshi and oil futures bets frontrunning the administrations announcements. for you to still feel the need to frame things as "border-line (to be polite)" is, in and of itself, the perfect example of the overall problem.

take your inability to draw a clear-as-day conclusion and state it plainly and multiply it by another ~50M "centrists" who continue to believe that staying "not political" and "avoiding the news" is a viable strategy to just wait the problem out.

until the checked out cowards realize that strategy isn't going to work, things will continue to get worse.

"no politics" might as as well be the second maga slogan.
cagenut
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
sorry thats too far left wing an opinion in america today
cagenut
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
really? or is it just that you don't like the answer so you keep trying to find another one.

what historical examples of this very common pattern did you read up on?
cagenut
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
is there anywhere good to read/follow to get operational clarity on this stuff?

my current system of looking for 1 in 1000 posts on HN or 1 in 100 on r/locallama is tedious.
cagenut
·il y a 5 mois·discuss
so is love

this level of reductive thought termination goes nowhere
cagenut
·il y a 5 mois·discuss
spacex is one thing but xai accomplished what? the most racist csam prone llm?
cagenut
·il y a 5 mois·discuss
it was basically a mindless loop, very prime for being agent driven:

  - observe error rate uptick
  - maybe dig in with apm tooling
  - read actual error messages
  - compare what apm and logs said to last commit/deploy
  - if they look even tangentially related deploy the previous commit (aka revert)
  - if its still not fixed do a "debug push", basically stuff a bunch of print statements (or you can do better) around the problem to get more info
I won't say that solves every case but definitely 90% of them.

I think your point about preserving some amount of intent/context is good, but also like what are most of us doing with agents if not "loop on error message until it goes away".
cagenut
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
after a decade of follow-the-sun deployments by php contractors from vietnam to costa rica where our only qa was keeping an eye on the 500s graph, ai can't scare me.
cagenut
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
obviously you're not a devops eng, I think you're wildly under-estimating how much of business critical code pre-ai is completely orphaned anyway.

the people who wrote it were contractors long gone, or employees that have moved companies/departments/roles, or of projects that were long since wrapped up, or of people who got laid off, or the people who wrote it simply barely understood it in the first place and certainly don't remember what they were thinking back then now.

basically "what moron wrote this insane mess... oh me" is the default state of production code anyway. there's really no quality bar already.
cagenut
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
it has been amazing to watch how much of agentic ai is driven by "can you write clear instructions to explain your goals and use cases" and "can you clearly define the rules of each step in your process."
cagenut
·il y a 7 mois·discuss
People Make Games did a mini documentary on almost exactly what you're asking: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PHT-zBxKQQ

Its three years old so things have slightly matured.
cagenut
·il y a 7 mois·discuss
you could stuff the racks full of server-rack batteries (lfp now, na-ion maybe in a decade) and monetize the space and the high capacity grid connect

most of the hvac would sit idle tho
cagenut
·il y a 9 mois·discuss
everybody read 'bullshit jobs' and basically agreed

at first that just meant many of us adopted a middle-aged-coasting career strategy after covid and/or having kids

but now management is agreeing
cagenut
·il y a 9 mois·discuss
hmmm thats 200g in the wrong direction
cagenut
·il y a 10 mois·discuss
wag that dog
cagenut
·il y a 7 ans·discuss
It is amazing how weird and poorly produced these things are. The cheesy outfits, the terrible lighting, the window demo failure. Its like they go out of their way to cut corners and look unprofessional to strike some kind of authenticity note. Like, obviously they're not faking the demo, or the windows wouldn't have broken. And the mumbling fumble/botched-transition to the ATV...

VH1 interns could produce a better event than this.
cagenut
·il y a 15 ans·discuss
These only sound like problems if you need to keep it single process. If you break out the javascript interpreter via fastcgi workers just like people do with php on nginx it becomes mostly moot points right? At that point its limited to 500 req/sec/core, but frankly these days that means 4000 req/s, which, hell, I'll take it.

Granted thats assuming you can actually run a fastcgi/v8 setup, I've never looked. I wonder how hard a mod_v8 for apache prefork would be.