But they aren't transmitted over public wifi. They are transmitted inside of some kind of private network, given that they are transmitted to a server in the 192.168/24 range
>All extracted information is bundled as a ZIP file, without applying any protection like a
password. The ZIP file is then sent via an HTTP POST request to
http://192.168.43.1:8080/. This shows that not only no transport security (e.g. https://) is
in place, but also that an internal IP address is used.
Unless they're expecting a MITM from the police network (or wherever they use this app) why is no https a problem?
>BXAQ uses the default icon for Android apps, which means there is no attempt at being
covert or discreet about it.
...or maybe they didn't put an icon because it's optional and unnecessary for what essentially is an internal app.
I mean really they are not trying to be unbiased or anything about the analysis.
I don't know where you live but where I am both males and females have the same standards of fitness and hygiene but females can afford to be more picky about to whom they open their legs.
This reminds me of a story I read once of a guy who bought a 1000€ GPU from Amazon and got a 100€ GPU instead, obviously from a return. When he got to return it to get his 1000€ back, he was told that he had sent the wrong GPU, that it had been destroyed by them (like you would shred a sheet of paper) and asking for the right card to be sent to them.
It's in the interest of big corporations (like Google, Mozilla, and Microsoft) that making a browser is as complicated as possible so they face no competition.