Location: Cambridge MA, Chapel Hill NC and Dorset England
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Maybe but only to either North Carolina, London or Southwest England, and not for six months
Technologies: Python, C++, high-performance computing, all of the -omics, shotgun and capture sequencing, RNA-seq, ancient DNA sequencing with some frontend react as-needed
Résumé/CV: https://imgur.com/aKt2kT4 Email: f"alice@pearson.{}".format(extension for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland!)
Bio: Experienced research scientist for all of the -omics. University of Cambridge PhD, Harvard Postdoc in field-leading lab. Comfortable processing terabytes of text files on high-performance computing and only share results when I have a strong conviction that they are right. Have recently learned React as well. Would be a great asset to any -omics startup, especially in the consumer or medical genetics spaces. Very interested in primary industry—manufacturing, transportation and agriculture. Willing to consider quant finance roles as well.
You are right, but in in his "cartel", everyone was working for him. Kind of a monarchy. I feel these cartels are more of an actual oligarchy where each player has a separate role that gives it power instead of just reporting up to Pablo.
Taking the insurance example you have the "suppliers" (doctors, drug companies and device companies), the "venue" (hospital) and the "extractor" (insurer).
Similarly you have the "suppliers" (musicians), the "venue" (the venue I guess) and the "extractor" (Live Nation and Ticketmaster). No obvious mapping to the record labels, recording studios or (biggest of all) streamers but hopefully some similarities are present.
I feel like Escobar, the Sinaloa Cartel, etc, are much more top-down.
> People don't buy the cheapest car, house, clothing, or food they could possibly get by with... Yet we constantly hear the refrain that you shouldn't spend a given amount of money on solar, house improvements, appliances, etc. that might be better for the environment if the payback isn't somehow positive with a 10-20 year payback period.
I think the key thing here is that energy is 100% fungible unlike your examples. A kWH is a kWH.
Yes with heat pumps you're 100% correct but right now most of the US north does not use heat pumps to heat their house while the vast majority of the south US does use A/C which is way better per degree of temperature change than say heating oil which the vast majority of New England still uses.
Cooling by a degree takes less energy than heating by a degree (not to mention it's electric). Cooling a house from 35 (outside) to 23 (inside) takes is better for "the environment" than heating one from 11 to 23.
Think of how much better the signal-to-noise ratio of email would become.