germansolo

il y a 6 ansdiscuss

This was the main issue with the software we used. When it was slow, it would recommend that one driver take three orders to the same area while leaving others in the store with nothing, but when it was busy, it would suggest a driver only take one order even if there was three others in the immediate area and no drivers in the store. It didn't take into account the labor and mileage costs of its decisions. This was also a decade ago, I'm sure the software has been optimized for better results now.

germansolo

il y a 6 ansdiscuss

Yes we did, but most often you could just look at the delivery map and see what deliveries would go together. Optimization won't tell you which orders were not complete (waiting on an item that needed to be remade or was made wrong, etc.) and many times just eyeing the map and knowing the delivery area was all that was needed. Drivers also knew which shortcuts would be beneficial to use that the optimization would not know. The software at the time also would not be able to factor current traffic in the equation. It's been a while, maybe they do now, I don't know, I've left for greener pastures.

germansolo

il y a 6 ansdiscuss

This exactly. Having been a former franchisee of one of the big three pizza companies, I can attest that this is true. On a typical evening there could be as many as 30 to 40 deliveries in the store per hour. With that kind of volume, it is easy to route drivers where I can send 2 or 3 orders together to the same geographic area. It's just logistically easier when there is a high volume of orders and the geographic area of the store's delivery zone is small.

comments