Sorry if my English is broken and I may sound rude but this is my concern for the team.
Other than free time or money, I’m curious if the main issue is due to complex testing process on Windows within the community?
In concerning to support your community, how responsive will the team resolve issues on Windows even if it is ready? As far as I feel you need a project manager to drive the progress. If there is a dip in the quality or, consider rebuild Crystal from scratch that inspire by Go’s roadmap or you will simply throw a huge amount of monies and resources for the contributors to invest with no ROI where Go succeed in simplicity.
Even if you have a big funding at your disposal to fill other missing features and API where Zig already works on Windows and V language are moving hastily to support Windows with even less amount of donations. How did they have the right community to support which I think the Crystal inner working code can be tedious to work on? C is the best language at least most programmers know.
Someone in your team ought to give a serious thought to get this sort out or scale down to Crystal core to keep its simplicity at least: why would you choose LLVM in the first place when it can become complex for a small team and depending on Ruby’s new features that you have to keep adding? Go choose to be simplicity and not accepting new feature for 1.x even when they have vast amount of cash and software engineering?
To put it another opinion, I don’t see how Crystal should be benchmark against Go and others if they are vastly differ in feature capabilities. So for this case, what made you think of comparing?
Other than free time or money, I’m curious if the main issue is due to complex testing process on Windows within the community?
In concerning to support your community, how responsive will the team resolve issues on Windows even if it is ready? As far as I feel you need a project manager to drive the progress. If there is a dip in the quality or, consider rebuild Crystal from scratch that inspire by Go’s roadmap or you will simply throw a huge amount of monies and resources for the contributors to invest with no ROI where Go succeed in simplicity.
Even if you have a big funding at your disposal to fill other missing features and API where Zig already works on Windows and V language are moving hastily to support Windows with even less amount of donations. How did they have the right community to support which I think the Crystal inner working code can be tedious to work on? C is the best language at least most programmers know.
Someone in your team ought to give a serious thought to get this sort out or scale down to Crystal core to keep its simplicity at least: why would you choose LLVM in the first place when it can become complex for a small team and depending on Ruby’s new features that you have to keep adding? Go choose to be simplicity and not accepting new feature for 1.x even when they have vast amount of cash and software engineering?
To put it another opinion, I don’t see how Crystal should be benchmark against Go and others if they are vastly differ in feature capabilities. So for this case, what made you think of comparing?