HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

ironyman

no profile record

Submissions

Gatekeeping the Frontier: When AI Access Becomes a National Security Concern

rusi.org
1 points·by ironyman·il y a 12 jours·0 comments

What's in America's Code?

boozallen.com
2 points·by ironyman·il y a 18 jours·0 comments

Michael Saylor Admits to Using ChatGPT to Build STRC

finance.yahoo.com
3 points·by ironyman·il y a 21 jours·0 comments

G7 aims to see China supply no more than 60% of rare earths

mining.com
5 points·by ironyman·il y a 23 jours·1 comments

Palantir wants to 'defend the West,' but the West is wary

france24.com
2 points·by ironyman·il y a 23 jours·1 comments

US 'nuclear bros' test America's atomic revival

ft.com
3 points·by ironyman·il y a 24 jours·2 comments

China's control over indium phosphide exports threatens AI data centre rollout

reuters.com
7 points·by ironyman·il y a 28 jours·1 comments

Musk Looks to an Army of Loyalists to Help Make Him a Trillionaire

wsj.com
8 points·by ironyman·le mois dernier·6 comments

SpaceX IPO demand is approaching four times oversubscribed

reuters.com
11 points·by ironyman·le mois dernier·6 comments

NASA Says Farewell to Maven Mars Mission

nasa.gov
5 points·by ironyman·le mois dernier·2 comments

Elon Musk is expected to become the first trillionaire

nbcnews.com
24 points·by ironyman·le mois dernier·5 comments

The Messy Reality of Building an Empire in Space

wsj.com
4 points·by ironyman·le mois dernier·1 comments

Kevin O'leary claims China stirred data-center protests

washingtonpost.com
3 points·by ironyman·le mois dernier·3 comments

StoryScope: Investigating Idiosyncrasies in AI Fiction

arxiv.org
1 points·by ironyman·le mois dernier·0 comments

Report Alleges Chinese Influence Behind AI Data Center Pushback in the U.S.

dominotheory.com
10 points·by ironyman·il y a 2 mois·1 comments

Molten Salt Reactors Move Closer to Reality After Breakthrough at U.S. Lab

oilprice.com
7 points·by ironyman·il y a 2 mois·0 comments

America's A.I. Is Futuristic. China Is Just Making It Work

nytimes.com
5 points·by ironyman·il y a 2 mois·2 comments

The Life and Times of an American Tween

newyorker.com
3 points·by ironyman·il y a 2 mois·0 comments

Offenders sentenced up to 10 years for spying on TSMC

taipeitimes.com
127 points·by ironyman·il y a 2 mois·24 comments

'The job description is changing': mathematician Terence Tao on the rise of AI

nature.com
6 points·by ironyman·il y a 2 mois·0 comments

comments

ironyman
·il y a 24 jours·discuss
https://archive.ph/20260618053840/https://www.ft.com/content...
ironyman
·le mois dernier·discuss
paywall: https://archive.ph/20260610102727/https://www.wsj.com/articl...
ironyman
·le mois dernier·discuss
paywall: https://archive.ph/20260601043738/https://www.wsj.com/tech/b...
ironyman
·il y a 2 mois·discuss
paywall: https://archive.fo/20260509123059/https://www.nytimes.com/20...
ironyman
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
paywall: https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.ft.com/content/9e0e0f...
ironyman
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
paywall: https://archive.ph/xmr82
ironyman
·il y a 5 mois·discuss
paywall: https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.ft.com/content/b92fd9...
ironyman
·il y a 5 mois·discuss
DoD believes there is no chance (0%) China would agree to any nuclear treaties until they've hit parity with US/Russia in raw warhead count. And btw, DoD's unclassified assertions about their warhead count is based on old assumptions of their fissile material production and plutonium/tritium availability. In terms of ICBMs, they have production facilities that can make about 90 Peacekeeper-class missiles a year.

In other words, this is less about what China wants and more about where this puts the future nuclear posture of the US.
ironyman
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
Because cyber is not a flashy capability like a new jet or missile but it's an area where the US has the clear edge: https://www.iiss.org/research-paper/2021/06/cyber-power---ti...
ironyman
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
The Danes would have allowed all those things without the annexation, think new sub pens for our Virginias, Space Force base expansions and so on. There is simply no need to piss off an ally with this nonsense.
ironyman
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
Completely different matter. Military concerns aside, the main problem for China there is they know they're absolutely going get killed diplomatically and economically in the aftermath. The leadership knows well what would happen or else they would've done it long ago.
ironyman
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
paywall: https://archive.is/XbM4Q
ironyman
·il y a 8 mois·discuss
Anthropic probably doesn't have the independent capabilities to perform a full definitive attribution of sophisticated cyberattacks. They likely detected misuse of their tools and then worked with/provided information to the intelligence community (who are familiar with the modus operandi of Chinese APTs) who then did the attribution.
ironyman
·il y a 8 mois·discuss
It doesn't really matter how advanced your supercomputing infrastructure is .... the simulation is as good as the input and data from actual tests.

The big question is whether China is confident enough with the data they have from 47 tests.

Any non-subcritical testing is a gift to China as they are severely lagging behind US on number of tests conducted and therefore amount of data collected about warhead design.

Resumption of tests would add fresh data to verify new warhead designs over the decades since the last test. US would have a lesser need for new data given the amount of testing done during the cold war.

If US does conduct a nuclear test I bet a whole slew of test from China would come very shortly after that. Work has already been noticed in recent years in the test tunnel.

https://asia.nikkei.com/static/vdata/infographics/satellite-...
ironyman
·il y a 9 mois·discuss
paywall: https://archive.is/kpgMI
ironyman
·il y a 10 mois·discuss
paywall: https://archive.is/iW520