lazyatom·il y a 8 mois·discussIt used to be a lot worse, but now it's actually really low (I get to see all the pictures drawn, even if they don't go up into the final gallery).
lazyatom·il y a 9 mois·discussA direct thing he wrote is "Britain should be a kingdom primarily for the Brits", where previously he has unambigiously defined "Brits" and "native Brits" as "white British people". That's racist.
lazyatom·il y a 10 mois·discussHe links to some census statistics from Wikipedia about the demographic makeup of London over time, and then says:> In 2000, more than sixty percent of the city were native Brits. By 2024, that had dropped to about a thirdThose figures line up with the "White British" row of the table: 59.79% in 2001, 36.8% in 2021.So it seems pretty clear his definition of "native Brit" means "White British person".