leobuskin

107 karmajoined l’année dernière

leonardbuskin [at] gmail

comments

il y a 4 joursdiscuss

That's not a bailout for AI labs, I meant the "bailout" for Salesforce and others. There's absolutely no place for them in the world where we have Fable+ models. For many of them. Most of them (we just didn't get this feeling yet). Someone just trying to maintain the old world order, that's all. I don't think US economy would fail if those absolutely useless giants would go down.

il y a 4 joursdiscuss

@anthropic, can you finally add $800-$1000 per month plan and allow us to work instead of tracking your weekly changes and dramas? I think, we (individuals, small-medium biz, first of all) did our best to help you train the model like Fable. Enterprise-level lockdown (and API costs define this) is... unfair? I mean, we all knew that you all will just use us, but it's AI, right? For people, right? Right?

The only reason this is happening -> someone (US gov?) decided that it's time to bail out those who would inevitably die within a year or two otherwise, middlemen.

il y a 5 joursdiscuss

Mojo folks created a new language, officially called it "superset", and trying to sell to enterprise. And it's not a superset by definition, because it can't run it's "subset" (the original Python) without CPython (which was used as libcpython under the hood, iirc). It's a travesty.

il y a 5 joursdiscuss

It uses JIT

il y a 5 joursdiscuss

It passes only curated corpus (snippets), not the full CPython test suite. So, yes, reading is hard. Nothing against AI, btw.

il y a 5 joursdiscuss

It's possible, but we're at the moment when most of us can ask Fable to implement a custom compiler to a custom target for our favorite language, and even use it as a part of custom solution. Why do I need someone else's implementation? Where's the magic in this project? What's the secret sauce?

il y a 5 joursdiscuss

A few problems with this Fable's project:

1. It's not Python by any means, it's a subset with its own runtime, its own quirks and nuances;

2. It will be impossible to maintain parity with CPython without AI assistance;

3. It will die the same way as dozens of similar (even non-AI projects) died before, and reasons will be the same: (1) and (2).

il y a 17 joursdiscuss

“If you are already vibe-coded in Rust”, probably is better, Nub has a strong smell all the way (which is ok, just funny to compare with Bun).

P.S. The entire Bun’s anti-AI hysteria makes me very sad, sometimes it feels like a directed campaign

il y a 25 joursdiscuss

I’m using it a lot in AI-driven reverse-engineering (old DOS games), agents love it (usually Python harness)

il y a 28 joursdiscuss

It's a pretty big difference in quality, definitely no. I'll miss Fable a lot, it was the first time when the model was able to catch up with my abandoned compiler project, and it did it extremely well, I have seen nothing like this so far.

il y a 2 moisdiscuss

I've used Claude to fix/reconstruct & build leaked Win2k3 on Linux with original toolchain via Wine. This approach included full gdi sources reconstruction. I just don't know what to do with this, it's kinda difficult to "wash" on this scale

il y a 2 moisdiscuss

I apologize, may I ask you, do you use Bun? If yes, you probably do monitor the development of this project (I do, it sounds reasonable to track your tools/deps), probably familiar with Jared's coding style, decision making process, architecture nuances, previous choices? Do you have any issues opened/closed in Bun's repo? Were you satisfied with contributors' reaction? Do you feel you can trust devteam behind Bun?

il y a 2 moisdiscuss

I'm afraid "we" tackle (agressively) the wrong problem, also making it's tough for the maintainers, who did nothing wrong (I have a lot of sympathy towards Bun's developers, they got a lot of ugly feedback within the last month). I don't think AI-written code is the problem at all. Human signs off the changeset the same way as it happened before. I don't care if Rust rewrite did happen using pipeline/harness and LLMs, if the maintainer takes responsibility, and in projects like Bun it happens "by default", I think.

il y a 2 moisdiscuss

absolutely, and `its development seems to have taken a turn towards being fully vibe-coded` ungrounded claim confirms the hysteria, I'm afraid

il y a 2 moisdiscuss

@zhovner, would you consider reverse engineering of the blobs as a temporary measure? in 2026 it's very doable and scales

il y a 2 moisdiscuss

Gamepads usage doesn't match screen actions/movements through the entire presentation video(s), zero trust at this point.

Edit: I apologize, entirely missed the game itself, partially understand the mismatch now, but still, it's much heavier in the presentation than in real life for some reason

il y a 3 moisdiscuss

> Agentic management software is all the hype today: What started with Moltbot and OpenClaw now has a lot of competition: ZeroClaw, Hermes, AutoGPT etc.

Moltbot is OpenClaw, AutoGPT was born significantly before. I just couldn’t read after the first paragraph, I’ve lost the trust entirely, whatever/whoever wrote it.

il y a 3 moisdiscuss

This usage reset you did on April 23 will not mitigate the struggle we’ve experienced. I didn’t even notice it yesterday. I checked this morning and it came down from 25% weekly to 7%. What is this? I didn’t have problems for two months like many others (maybe my CC habits helped), but two weeks were very painful. Make a proper apology, guys. This “reset” for many users could hit the first days of the week, tell me you thought about that.

il y a 3 moisdiscuss

What's the backend? I'd recommend to migrate such project to the edge (Cloudflare, etc)

il y a 3 moisdiscuss

And as a bonus: GPT is slow. I’m doing a lot of RE (IDA Pro + MCP), even when 5.4 gives a little bit better guesses (rarely, but happens) - it takes x2-x4 longer. So, it’s just easier to reiterate with Opus