HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

leojfc

no profile record

comments

leojfc
·le mois dernier·discuss
Oh nice, looks awesome, I will give it a go!
leojfc
·le mois dernier·discuss
Yes, and I'd go a step further: OSes in general need a concept of a 'project' or 'task' or whatever, which a) cuts across apps and b) integrates deeply with windowing and spaces.

Multitasking and context switching has been increasing for years, instant messaging boosted them again, and agent-based workflows are only going to push further in that direction. The OS needs to support that, and it's not an app-level concern: I use the same apps in each of my tasks.

IDEs can help with this of course: they tend to have workspace/project primitives and can restore code and terminal contexts from those. But there's always a bunch of other connected stuff that can't be linked: web pages (some IDEs are starting to manage those too), agents which don't reside in the IDE, relevant chats with colleagues, project management apps and so on.

This is clearly an OS-level concern, not an app-level concern.

Some of the iPad experiments with alternative window organisation looked kind of promising, but they’re just not powerful or intuitive enough IMO.
leojfc
·il y a 9 mois·discuss
Thanks for writing this up — some great insights!

The server deciding what to replace reminds me of some old (dangerous, I think) patterns like returning actual JS from the server which the client then executes.

But it was a nice pattern to work with: for example if you made code changes you often got hot-reloading ‘for free’ because the client can just query the server again. And it was by definition infinitely flexible.

I’d be interested to hear from anyone with experience of both Datastar and Hotwire. Hotwire always seemed very similar to HTMX to me, but on reflection it’s arguably closer to Datastar because the target is denoted by the server. I’ve only used Hotwire for anything significant, and I’m considering rewriting the messy React app I’ve inherited using one of these, so it’s always useful to hear from others about how things pan out working at scale.
leojfc
·il y a 9 mois·discuss
Absolutely. Years ago I found this book on the topic really eye-opening:

- https://www.amazon.co.uk/Technological-Revolutions-Financial...

The process of _actually_ benefitting from technological improvements is not a straight line, and often requires some external intervention.

e.g. it’s interesting to note that the rising power of specific groups of workers as a result of industrialisation + unionisation then arguably led to things like the 5-day week and the 8-hour day.

I think if (if!) there’s a positive version of what comes from all this, it’s that the same dynamic might emerge. There’s already lots more WFH of course, and some experiments with 4-day weeks. But a lot of resistance too.