morisil

il y a 21 joursdiscuss

I am shocked how much my experience is different from yours. I wrote Claudine, my own version of Claude Code, almost 2 years ago. This experience gave me the understanding of how the technology works. Since then I've produced maybe 300k lines of open source code, and all of it meaningful to the bones. What kind of projects are you working on, maybe it's the specificity of your domain?

morisil

le mois dernierdiscuss

Quite aligned with my own experience from harness engineering and winning AI4Science hackathon. During the hackathon I was working as a human optimizer, moving the feedback from test harness running on Claude Code, back to my local Claude Code for analysis-hypothesis-proposal cycle. And in this moment I realized that 2 Claudes talking to each other could actually scale much better.

morisil

il y a 2 moisdiscuss

I've been teaching harness engineering for a while:

https://xemantic.com/ai/workshops/

morisil

il y a 2 moisdiscuss

How do you handle possible prompt injection in emails?

morisil

il y a 2 moisdiscuss

https://github.com/xemantic/markanywhere

Incremental Markdown parser that emits streams of semantic events, plus tools to manipulate them - designed for real-time rendering of streamed LLM output.

morisil

il y a 3 moisdiscuss

Regarding applications/industries - after software development as an industry I see scientific research benefiting the most from agentic AI and autonomous machine reasoning. Another domain which is still not saturated would be something I call "personal guardian angel", which usually extends to whole families. Quite often people use OpenClaw for these use cases. Personally I build my own harnesses. One instance is set up as a CEO of my organization, taking care of operations, and another one, completely separate, operating over private knowledge about my family matters, schedules, medical history, etc. I predict context graph and metacognitive use cases to get rapid adoption this year.

- I've built 2 harnesses, one called Claudine - an older sister of Claude Code which now I use for teaching harness engineering, and Golem XIV, with context/knowledge graph management and self-directed metacognitive research.

- In practice rather Anthropic models if the quality of the metacognitive reasoning process and self-improvement loops are considered.

morisil

il y a 6 moisdiscuss

More than a year ago I built my own coding agent called Claudine. I also made agentic anthropic-sdk-kotlin and few other AI libraries for the ecosystem. Maybe this low-level experience allows me to use these tools to deliver in 2 days what would have taken 2 months before.

My advice - embrace TDD. Work with AI on tests, not implementation - your implementation is disposable, to be regenerated, tests fully specify your system through contracts. This is more tricky for UI than for logic. Embracing architectures allowing to test view model in separation might help. I general anything reducing cognitive load during inference time is worth doing.

morisil

il y a 6 moisdiscuss

Suboptimal choice. According to AutoCodeBench, for equivalent problem complexity, LLMs generate correct Kotlin code ~70% of the time versus ~40% for Python, and Go scores lower than Python. Kotlin can be executed as a script while providing super fast compilation phase next to evaluation phase, which is further reducing a chance of mistakes. I don't use tools anymore. I just let my LLMs output Kotlin script directly together with DSLs tailored to the problem space, reducing cognitive load for the machine. It works like a charm as a Claude Code replacement, not only coding autonomously in any language, but directly scripting DB data science, Playwright, etc., while reducing context window bloat.

morisil

il y a 9 moisdiscuss

1. LLMs excell at extracting facts from the context. Storing them as a subject-predicate-object relationships is "natural" for graph databases. Doing it right, so that this knowledge can be utilized more efficiently than any RAG, requires sophisticated context engineering, for example to avoid duplicates and keep consistent vocabulary for relationships, but it is totally achievable and the quality of automatically extracted knowledge can be almost spotless, especially if an LLM can also decide on generating parallel embeddings as a semantic search entry point for graph traversal.

2. Writing cypher queries is a job I would never like to have as a human. But LLMs love it, so that an agent can do an ad hoc data science for every single problem. Especially while being aware which criteria were used for graph construction. It is worth ditching things like MCP in favor of tool graph-like solutions. For this purpose I developed my own DSL which only LLM speaks in internally. The effects are mind-blowing.

morisil

l’année dernièrediscuss

I would support every political and social movement progressing us on the spectrum from patriarchy to matriarchy. In particular I would put pressure on the legal system of countries where women are still not allowed to inherit land and property.

The next biggest problems to tackle:

  - the way we are producing proteins
  - the way we are producing energy

Short term problems to address:

  - adoption of cognitive AI in scientific research

I am building very potent autonomous AI agents now, so soon I will be able to unleash them to crunch all these problems, hopefully. :)

morisil

l’année dernièrediscuss

Personally I use it for implementing complete new features using test driven development, or fix bugs in existing code base.

Outside of software development I use it for managing all the legal documents of our cooperative (and it's Germany, and I don't speak German well ;) )

morisil

l’année dernièrediscuss

It is exactly the opposite. Participants collect all the pieces of knowledge to build an agent like my Claudine at the end of the workshop:

https://github.com/xemantic/claudine/

morisil

l’année dernièrediscuss

I added this functionality already some time ago in my Claudine agent:

https://github.com/xemantic/claudine/

It costed roughly 30 lines of code: https://github.com/xemantic/claudine/blob/main/src/commonMai...

morisil

l’année dernièrediscuss

I am the author of Claudine, who presented the project during this meetup, and I am happy that it is inspiring others. Claudine is intended for educational purposes, so that anyone can easily build a powerful (e.g. Unix-omnipotent) autonomous agent. It is possible thanks to my work on:

https://github.com/xemantic/anthropic-sdk-kotlin

Much more complex custom agents can be built thanks to this library, simplifying the task as much as I could design it.

Submissions

[untitled]

Show HN: Markanywhere – A Streaming Processor of Meanings

I just wrote 'Global Agentic Night Berlin we are cooking'

Show HN: Neo4j SDK with minimal cognitive load for an LLM

LiveCodeBench Pro – better than SWE-bench and aider's polyglot bench?

Ask HN: Qwen3 – is it ready for driving AI agents?

Ask HN: How to teach agentic AI? Please share your experience

comments