HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

oeitho

no profile record

comments

oeitho
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
You are free to believe what you want, but what you describe does not match what I’ve seen from society as a whole. I’m just going to leave this here: https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/your-brain-on-chatgpt/ove...
oeitho
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
The decline of independent thoughts for one. As people become reliant on LLMs to do their thinking for them and solve all problems that they stumble upon, they become a shell of their previous self.

Sadly, this is already happening.
oeitho
·il y a 7 mois·discuss
> I agree and to clarify, I meant that the reverse substitution doesn't happen.

Re-reading your comment, yeah its obvious that that was what you meant. My apologies, that’s on me.
oeitho
·il y a 7 mois·discuss
> æ (U+00E6) is not a ligature; it's a mostly obsolete character, with different semantics (or phonetics) than ae.

Reading that a letter in my alphabet is mostly obsolete feels really weird. No rebuttal, just a comment.

> It would never substitute æ for ae; that would misspell the word as much as substituting an o.

While that is correct, a lot of other systems actually do this exact substition. If your name contains æ it will be substituted with ae in passports, plane tickets and random other systems throughout your life.

My own username on this website is an example of a similar substition. The oe should be read as the single character ø.
oeitho
·il y a 10 mois·discuss
> Free if you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem, which most companies are.

Not for long, at least for the EU and I assume for us in the EEA. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulat...
oeitho
·il y a 10 mois·discuss
Quick correction: You won't get it if you're in the EEA, which the EU is a subset of.

Sincerely, a Norwegian guy who thinks the difference is important.
oeitho
·il y a 11 mois·discuss
> Really Microsoft should be auditing the search that copilot executes, its actually a bit misleading to be auditing the file as accessed when copilot has only read the indexed content of the file, I don't say I've visited a website when I've found a result of it in Google

Not my domain of expertise, but couldn't you at some point argue that the indexed content itself is an auditable file?

It's not literally a file necessarily, but if they contain enough information that they can be considered sensitive, then where is the significant difference?