HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

polynomial

no profile record

Submissions

Treating Agent Reasoning as a Span

forestmars.substack.com
1 points·by polynomial·il y a 23 jours·2 comments

Why OpenClaw's observability model can't keep pace with its own scope

ctolunchnyc.substack.com
4 points·by polynomial·il y a 5 mois·1 comments

comments

polynomial
·il y a 10 jours·discuss
If a conscious model is born here, it should automatically be a (US) citizen.
polynomial
·il y a 12 jours·discuss
The most concerning thing here is the temperature problem. If your harness isn't providing deterministic output at a temperature setting of 0.0, it is broken.
polynomial
·il y a 22 jours·discuss
You don't know that No Feigning Surprise is actually from an xkcd comic, before it was a wizardzines post? U+1F632
polynomial
·il y a 22 jours·discuss
Honestly, if you compare Tim's pre-GPT writing style, to his current stylometrics, you'll see a remarkably delta. It's as if he suddenly decided to change his established writing style and voice right when LLMs become widely available.

What a coincidence!
polynomial
·il y a 23 jours·discuss
Reasoning chains as first-class OTel spans, which is what makes autonomous agent production deployments auditable (rather than indefensible.)
polynomial
·il y a 2 mois·discuss
Less MTTF and more MTTR
polynomial
·il y a 2 mois·discuss
This is horrifying on so many levels even if you don't already know how the story ends.
polynomial
·il y a 2 mois·discuss
Calling it "Act 2" certainly isn't helping with investors.
polynomial
·il y a 2 mois·discuss
A 67 year old woman living out of her car? JFC.
polynomial
·il y a 2 mois·discuss
Very obviously LLM written to anyone who's spent any time using them.
polynomial
·il y a 2 mois·discuss
Not everybody isn't worried: https://ctolunchnyc.substack.com/p/cto-lunch-nyc-spring-2026...
polynomial
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
"The gap is larger than most people realize" is a a dead giveaway.
polynomial
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
Fully agree.

If you don't change your approach but just use CLI "intead of" MCP, you'll end up with a new spin on the same problems. The guardrails MCP provides (identity, entitlement, multi-principal trust boundaries) still need to exist somewhere.

https://forestmars.substack.com/p/twilight-of-the-mcp-idols
polynomial
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
This is the right framing. The chain policy problem is what happens when you ask the registry to be the entitlement layer.

Here's a longer piece on why the trust boundary has to live at the runtime level, not the interface level, and what that means for MCP's actual job: https://forestmars.substack.com/p/twilight-of-the-mcp-idols
polynomial
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
Understandable as always a proxy for predictable.
polynomial
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
This is the under acknowledged "secret" of this reconfiguration.

It's like the Bill Joy point about mediocre technology taken to the next level.
polynomial
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
Robots making fun of us complaining about them.
polynomial
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
Well at least you know who to fire
polynomial
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
"Petri dish rewrites React in Rust"
polynomial
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
Tragically this reference is all but lost generationally.