It speaks specifically to this, and basically says if you are motivated by external forces, that's how you're wired and you should capitalize on it... it is a waste of time to try get 'internally' motivated. A lot of people are this way, and there is nothing wrong with it.
I liken it to a car that runs on gas... retrofitting it to run on diesel (or electric) is counter-productive... just tune it up so it efficient at burning gas.
The value that GH added here was that they were higher up than any of the restaurant's competitors, too.
So, absent of GH, that pizza sale, instead of going to GH, might have gone to a competitive pizza place.
So the restaurant has to evaluate-- it is better that I get the order through GH, or that I don't possibly get the order at all, and it goes to a competitor?
>I tried a new place recently, only to find out I had been duped by Grub-hub
So you found a new restaurant, the restaurant found a new customer, and grub-hub is cut out of the (future) picture. Didn't grubhub earn that commission in this case?
I have no love (or hate) for grub-hub... but it seems like a business hired a salesperson on commission, knowing full well the parameters of the deal, and then gets upset when they actually bring in sales.
In most other industries the restaurant would be considered the 'bad guy' for trying to take the business direct and cheating the rep out of a commission.
I agree.. it's the message that there is another 'point of failure' that no one has paid much attention to.
If you want Amazon/AWS to change it's ways, then you need to get the attention of CIO's.
And I think regular walkouts of 100 engineers who monitor the network is going to do a better job of getting it than a single architect leaving, no matter how much of a star he was.
I think it would have been more effective if he just 'called in sick' (if that was possible for him) or staged an extended walkout of engineers. I have all my infrastructure on AWS and the prospect that it could all come to a halt immediately and unexpectedly makes me think of other providers or at least spreading my workoad to azure, google, etc.. and that should get Amazon's attention.
I really don't think a single top level engineer voting with his feet will have any measurable impact technically or financially on amazon.
> That’s why entrepreneurs, myself included, waste years of their lives on shitty ideas that will never work, following the popular trend of “ideas don’t matter, only execution matters”.
The saying has to do with just having an idea is worthless in itself, you have to do something with that idea.
He interprets it as a shitty idea will be successful if executed well.
I think the author's assumption is that the subscriber would use the service for twelve months whether they were on monthly or annual.
So, if that's the case, you're better off taking the extra x% percent that a monthly plan gives you.
I think the author was also making the point that while you might have all your money upfront, you won't manage it well so it lasts all year. Could you? Yes. Will you? No.
And from personal experience, depending on who your customer is, a yearly plan can make revenue far less predictable.. for a corporate customer there is a big difference between a $12k annual charge, and $1k monthly charge. The first they will scrutinize every year and question its value, while the second they might not even notice.
It is the simplest, most well designed app I have encountered... and it is free.