HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

roetlich

326 karmajoined il y a 8 ans
Hi, my name is till. Feel free to reach out to me, contact info is on my website. There you'll also find some blog posts about programming languages.

Email: hn at my domain name. Website: https://till.red/ Business email: till @ business domain name. Business website: https://specificadvice.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/till-schroeder/ meet.hn/city/ee-Tallinn

comments

roetlich
·il y a 23 heures·discuss
Love the exclamation marks. So let's just use, for example, this definition: https://www.britannica.com/topic/ad-hominem

Here it's a type of argument, and it's only sometimes a fallacy. Seems like this how it's defined most of the time, unless you explicitly look for "ad hominem fallacy". Ad hominem without any context can be vague, I guess, so I tried to be more explicit.

I don't know, maybe I'm wrong, English isn't my first language, but I think "Obvious Fabrication" (capital letters) is a bit silly.
roetlich
·avant-hier·discuss
Oh yes, I didn't clarify that I meant an argumentum ad hominem, which isn't the same thing as the informal fallacy of the same name. So yeah, I agree, this isn't directly fallacious.
roetlich
·avant-hier·discuss
> if Andrew isn't trying to enter the discussion

But he is. Both in the title, and in later half of the blog post, he directly enters that discussion. I'm not saying an ad hominem argument is always bad, but this clearly is one.
roetlich
·avant-hier·discuss
No, the discussion started with a the article from Bun, stating that rust has some technical advantages for them. The response from the Zig creator is a bunch of personal attacks directed at one guy, like calling him a stinky manager. All of these are fully unrelated to which language is better for Bun.

This is like the textbook definition of an ad hominem.
roetlich
·il y a 15 jours·discuss
Well, this seems like a very dangerous way of using AI. If you keep pushing until you get back an answer that makes sense to you, you might just get your own believes fed back to you.
roetlich
·le mois dernier·discuss
Who would have thought that git worktree is the technology of the year 2026?
roetlich
·le mois dernier·discuss
Great, now we need this with current data for modern governments
roetlich
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
Great idea, to include learning into the regular work.

Can you explain how the lessons are generated?

It looks like there are no pre-generated lessons, they are created on the fly by the AI. Wouldn't it be possible to write a skill or similar that does the same with your existing coding agent?
roetlich
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
My Firefox doesn't accept your https cert. Maybe check that out?
roetlich
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
What does "done offline" mean? Otherwise you are limited by context window.
roetlich
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
"Managment" usually are office workers.
roetlich
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
> Does it continue if you agree to the warning?

No, you can't "agree".

> What if you ask about 9/11?

It answers the question.
roetlich
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
Well, most interpreters use a compiler internally, for example to compile to byte code. The book explains that as well, so I'd recommend just reading it: https://craftinginterpreters.com/a-map-of-the-territory.html...
roetlich
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
Thanks, will fix! Haven't maintaineed the website in a bit :)
roetlich
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
https://till.red/ :)
roetlich
·il y a 7 mois·discuss
Very cool! Why was and the entire networking stack straight forward, but not HTTP (and TCP)? Could you take inspiration form other projects for things like DNS?
roetlich
·il y a 8 mois·discuss
Interesting! The article talks mostly about how this all worked, but rarely about what was actually discussed. Which opinions of the party do you like or support?
roetlich
·il y a 9 mois·discuss
> one door per day until it's Christmas eve

That would be 24.
roetlich
·l’année dernière·discuss
Unless you modify Redis, what do you want to share? You don't have to share any of your server code or anything. No reason to be so dramatic. :)
roetlich
·il y a 5 ans·discuss
The website doesn't know what your other UI looks like, it only knows whether you requested dark mode in your browser. Feel free to change your browser settings.