HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

slaye

82 karmajoined il y a 10 mois
ʕ ◕ᴥ◕ ʔ Hello!

Submissions

Ask HN: What is your opinion on workplace review websites like Glassdoor?

8 points·by slaye·il y a 6 mois·2 comments

comments

slaye
·il y a 8 jours·discuss
Immich promotes a 3-2-1 backup strategy in their docs you can read about: https://docs.immich.app/administration/backup-and-restore/

Admittedly I have not set up backups yet because my homelab setup is not very mature.

I'm running everything off a single mini PC connected to a fresh 1TB SSD. My next "homelab goal" is setting up a NAS/DAS once I can snag something affordable off eBay/FB Marketplace/Kleinanzeigen/etc.

I think there are some super cheap cloud storage solutions where you pay a lot less in costs to not have on-demand access. That is the route I was going to go personally.
slaye
·il y a 8 jours·discuss
Done! <3
slaye
·il y a 8 jours·discuss
An incredible piece of software, on par with Google Photos. I've been using it behind Tailscale for months with no problems ever since I first got into homelabbing.

Actually, moving from Google Photos to Immich after I hit my 100GB storage limit was the whole reason I got into self-hosting, and what a fun ride that has been!

I can't believe self-hosted products of this caliber are free. Huge shout-out to HomeAssistant, PiHole, paperless-ngx, Dawarich, and countless others for the same reason.

Congrats to the team on the release and thank you for helping me catalogue my personal memories
slaye
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
Thanks for sharing that article!
slaye
·il y a 4 mois·discuss
Simon, if you're reading this, I'd be really curious to hear your thoughts on how to effectively conduct code reviews in a world where "code is cheap".

One of the biggest struggles I have on my team is coworkers straight up vibing parts of the code and not understanding or guiding the architecture of subsystems. Or at least, not writing code in a way that is meant to be understood by others.

Then when I go through the code and provide extensive feedback (mostly architectural and highlighting odd inconsistencies with the code additions) I'm met with much pushback because "it works, why change it"? Not to mention the sheer size of prs ballooning in recent months.

The end result is me being the bottleneck because I can't keep up with the "pace" of code being generated, and feeling a lot of discomfort and pressure to lower my standards.

I've thought about using a code review agent to review and act as me in proxy, but not being able to control the exact output worries me. And I don't like the lack of human touch it provides. Maybe someone has advice on a humane way to handle this problem.