HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

ville

no profile record

Submissions

Code review is not about catching bugs

davidpoll.com
10 points·by ville·il y a 2 mois·1 comments

What Claude Code Chooses

amplifying.ai
4 points·by ville·il y a 3 mois·3 comments

Relocating Rigor

aicoding.leaflet.pub
1 points·by ville·il y a 4 mois·0 comments

Ukraine agrees minerals deal with US

ft.com
8 points·by ville·l’année dernière·15 comments

Scott and Scurvy (2010)

idlewords.com
2 points·by ville·l’année dernière·0 comments

Baltics disconnect from Russian power grid, start isolated operation

lrt.lt
15 points·by ville·l’année dernière·0 comments

comments

ville
·il y a 2 mois·discuss
No, the point was that pressing the Tab key often does something else than inserts the tab character. Moves focus to the next input field, for example.
ville
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
When it uses 3rd party libraries, it's interesting how it ends up choosing the tools it does: e.g. why does it strongly prefer shadcn/ui as a UI component library and SQLModel as a Python ORM? Is this about which tools were trending in its training data?
ville
·l’année dernière·discuss
According to the FT article:

"Ukrainian officials say Kyiv is now ready to sign the agreement on jointly developing its mineral resources, including oil and gas, after the US dropped demands for a right to $500bn in potential revenue from exploiting the resources."

--

"The final version of the agreement, dated February 24 and seen by the FT, would establish a fund into which Ukraine would contribute 50 per cent of proceeds from the “future monetisation” of state-owned mineral resources, including oil and gas, and associated logistics. The fund would invest in projects in Ukraine.

It excludes mineral resources that already contribute to Ukrainian government coffers, meaning it would not cover the existing activities of Naftogaz or Ukrnafta, Ukraine’s largest gas and oil producers.

However, the agreement omits any reference to US security guarantees which Kyiv had originally insisted on in return for agreeing to the deal. It also leaves crucial questions such as the size of the US stake in the fund and the terms of “joint ownership” deals to be hashed out in follow-up agreements."