It's great that you found a diet that worked for you, but it's strange to say that the article is remiss to not include your specific diet - unless you also think it should include every diet. For any given diet, you can find people whom it helped tremendously, and the carnivore diet is no different. There's also very little evidence for its effectiveness (which is not to say it's not effective, just that it's not particularly well-studied). Personally, I could eat enough meat daily to get very fat if I wasn't counting my calories. When my compliance is struggling, I find high-fiber diets to be the most effective in curbing hunger.
Is the point here that we already can't control civilization, so we don't have to worry about AI interfering with our ability to control civilization? Is it really impossible to imagine us having even less control over civilization - and that being a bad thing?
Generally the advantage of a bishop over a knight is its increased mobility. The bishop pair is more mobile than N+N or B+N and can control both color complexes. To exploit the mobility advantage, good players tend to try to "open up" the position more to increase the scope of the bishops. A classic example of a strategic goal if you want to play for an open position is to keep the pawn structure fluid (as opposed to locked up), which can be too subtle for weaker players.
Can you point to a single usage in the context of property prices where "being down X%", without specifying that X is referring to a YoY increase, means what you say?
I think it goes without saying that if the small countries near the edge of the world are the only ones participating in free trade, there's not a whole lot of free trade going on. Not to mention the astronomical increase in shipping costs that would occur if the world stops collectively deciding that intercepting container ships is off-limits.
There are myriad other examples where you can take action now to avail yourself of a future mild inconvenience that you might not take if the inconvenience were experienced by someone else instead. And I can't imagine that you think telling me I don't understand what GP said, without offering clarification of your own, is a useful comment.
Why set your future self up for success if your only connection to that person is a story in your head? What is supposed to change when you take this view of being disconnected with your future self?
I don't understand this at all. Do you also think like this about the "future you" that might have to shit themself on the bus ride if you don't go to the bathroom before you leave?
>There is almost no amount of physical activity that can offset excess consumption.
Very odd statement to make without quantifying how much "excess" there is in the "excess consumption". If walking a couple extra hours a day on vacation burns (say) 500 calories, that's a pretty large buffer of extra food you can eat - a 20% increase if you're eating 2500 calories per day. But of course a determined glutton can out-eat this.
2. As a couple, you never spend "her" money because it's "her" money. You die having spent none of the money
3. At some point in the future, you start spending "her" money
(3) doesn't make sense given she's uncomfortable with it now. (2) also doesn't make much sense. So to me it seems like either she's acting irrationally or expects that (1) is a strong possibility.
I have no experience with this subject, but I don't think hot food needing to be "held" at 135°F has any implications regarding the cooking temperature. The document you linked seems to be forbidding holding TCS food below 135°F for more than 4 hours.
To claim that you need to spend money equal to the tax-assessed value of the building over the course of 30 years to maintain equal value is slightly less ridiculous, but still not exactly reasonable. The (conservative) rule of thumb is 1% of the property value per year in repairs, which would be 30% of the property value over 30 years. And even then, it seems there's no shortage of fairly decrepit buildings that have no problem finding tenants.
Let me try! Credit cards make cryptocurrency (which doesn't have broad merchant support, charge-back ability, and, you know, the literal "credit" part of it) entirely obsolete.