HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

xtacy

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by xtacy·il y a 3 mois·0 comments

Performance Speed Limits (2019)

travisdowns.github.io
18 points·by xtacy·il y a 11 mois·1 comments

A whirlwind tutorial on creating teensy ELF executables for Linux (1999)

muppetlabs.com
59 points·by xtacy·l’année dernière·17 comments

comments

xtacy
·il y a 3 mois·discuss
Curious - what’s this court filing?
xtacy
·il y a 6 mois·discuss
> QUIC is not bad, but there are places where it either does not work at all or works too slow.

Curious: in your experience where does QUIC work bad/slow?
xtacy
·il y a 11 mois·discuss
Are there good public examples of well designed APIs that have stood the test of time?
xtacy
·il y a 11 mois·discuss
Is it GBps (gigabytes per second) or Gbps (giga bits per second)? I see mixed usage in this comment thread so I’m left wondering what it actually is.

The article is consistent and uses Gigabytes.
xtacy
·l’année dernière·discuss
We do have a model. That’s statistical physics.

Any standard course goes over various derivations of classical physics laws (Newtonian dynamics) from quantum mechanics.
xtacy
·il y a 5 ans·discuss
I suspect that the web server's CPU usage will be pretty high (almost 100%), so C-state tuning may not matter as much?

EDIT: also, RSS happens on the NIC. RFS happens in the kernel, so it might not be as effective. For a uniform request workload like the one in the article, statically binding flows to a NIC queue should be sufficient. :)
xtacy
·il y a 7 ans·discuss
I think you meant to say -- Type 1 is a false positive, and type 2 is a false negative.