But also, don't. The world is chock-full of unstable, insecure, incomplete apps, services and technologies. Our desire to be first to market, or to practice extreme continuous improvement via rapid iteration and rapid feedback creates motivations which, in some ways, are antithetical to the moral imperative we as engineers should all feel. That of creating technology that is secure, private and stable. We don't need another password breach, we don't need another growth metric driven app the belies the privacy invasions that power that growth metric.
I am not sure how mysterious this is. As Scott Gottlieb (hardly a COVID denialist) pointed out[1], we are getting the impacts of some level of immunity in populations.
Herd immunity itself is a threshold, but it isn't a binary state. As you near it, the "susceptible" pool becomes fewer and fewer. Since reinfections appear rare (though not impossible) and immunity seems robust and at least 6-12 months long, it is no mystery that cases will begin to fall.
IANAL, but I think by making the purchase on Amazon, you are consenting to the delivery methods in order to fulfill the contract you entered with Amazon to purchase and deliver the product.
Unfortunately this article doesn’t really give YouTube’s reasoning for the removal. Did the Drs advance debunked conspiracy theories in addition to the comments regarding ivermectin?
If so, it is a bit of bait-and-switch to defend the portion of the presentation that wasn’t grounds for the removal. Seeing as this is a persuasive argument I would be more persuaded had the author been transparent about YouTube’s reasoning. As I’m sure the author, a lawyer and politician, knows the art of persuasive rhetoric well, his oversight seems intentional.
Over a trash can, bury it in a hole in a park, carry a small bag with me to throw away, in a bucket, at a library or other public building, in a park toilet, at a Target..
Literally anywhere other than the public thoroughfare or someone’s stoop.
Make old ideas better, make new ideas mature.