"Thats the way to have problem fixed, have it directly impact upon the live of your representative. Thus, good lobbyism is always to try to convert the selected Ones to ones vices and habbits."
Let us toast to this great victory of the content-industry, with table-water (599 Spotify Downloads a glass). When i look around today, i see a lot of smiling faces. Those smiles, that bliss of total unawareness, that the state may have a interest in subsidied cheap bread and games, is what really keeps the game and movie industrie going.
Im proud to be here, and im proud to get paid this well to speak here.
Here is to you, great Pyrrhic, may we have many partys like this more.
Seeing how often the cracks where infected, this approach by the - not - entertainment industry, will be the road the giants of tomorrow will take. Apple, google - they will try to brick any remaining free device.
A genius is somebody shizophrenic enough to make connections where others are incapable off doing so, while still remaining sane enough to filter the results and only ocassionally walk the street naked at night, to escape the satellites tracking him/her with bugs embedded into buttons (lets call it sabatical).
To be this mad is nothing worthy to strive for. It comes with real cons.
Con A: Your family has usual several shizos who are "over the edge", meaning people who are in need of constant care.
Con B: If you get the necessary education to contribute more then spynovellas and abstract art in this unstable family environment, which may include initially getting pushed into engineering/the sciences against your will - boy/girl are you lucky.
Con C: No drugs, no long partying, no chem-triggering yourself of any kind (no, coffee - what a world!)
Con D: Selfisolation tendencies- as perceiving other people as hostile, overinterpreting constantly on theire intent is very tiresome- thus, you end up self isolating to not feel the sting of beeing constant wrong (aka Mad) all along on your spouse.
Con E: Good Connections can also be had by normal people now, if they would go for that. There are several systems to make them and find exotic and interesting solutions. The real problem starts with normal people fighting against new ideas because they pose a risk to there career, there company, the process and there concept of self-worth.
Con F: You are not systematic, meaning for example, to set up a coherent list will be impossible.
Con 8: Martyrers of any kind, in religion become sort of very attractive- or was it the other way around, that martyrer religion produce more durable creative bonkers people? The irony is that israel, america and irans cultural looks very much alike to a bonkers inventor.
Con G: The real trouble starts, when the normal people run out of ressources, and start to vote the "geniuses" as war-chieftains to power, usually after a prolonged episode of "pulling up more Cash obsticles to actual archivers". If you are constantly in danger of beeing the guy/girl who the mob will turn to when they need a witch-streetlight, its a good quality to turn on the needle and point on any group guilty of beeing not part of the mob enough. Thus artists and geniuses- the worst group to look for integrity the day the madmen gets voted to power.
Con H: Sometimes people crash, like computers, and spend the rest of there days iterrating over a "topic" or "obsession" totally not worth it.
Con I: CEOs and Decisionsmakers constantly crowding in on "working" geniuses, trying to deduce the "process". Its laughable- but there is no process.
There is no method to learn, there is nothing you can take home from that art-gallery-meetup.
The process consist of a mind constantly recombining stuff that is not supossed to be recombined, throwing away metric tons of wrong stuff subconciously and sometimes putting out ideas, with a tacked on invented backstory how they came to be.
Thats it. And as you are going to sit on those patents and stuff anyway, and live in constant fear, that all those incremental investments blow up, why fly towards the fire, little moth?