> That isn't making them look like an idiot, reducing them, or demolishing their position.
I think he's saying that he can reduce his opponent to those words - i.e., the author's argument fits together, the opponent says "it's just wrong" and gets frustrated.
They could try, but who would pay for it at a worthwhile price? The bank already defaulted. The loan has value and can be sold because the borrower is still solvent.
I think he's saying that he can reduce his opponent to those words - i.e., the author's argument fits together, the opponent says "it's just wrong" and gets frustrated.