Certainly an android is more human - humans and only humans create those machines and make them a part of us.
We could ask, was mowgli more human than all of the suited gentlemen in New York? Of course not. Mowgli was lesser human than them.
Where does it end? Who knows? At this point, Isaac Asimov's The Last Question comes to my mind.
> but it's profound to think our goal is to evolve to no longer be human.
What makes us human? We know from experience that children are often cruel towards other animals, even other children,and get drunk on power too easily. So this kind of aggression is something innate, right?
But we have learned from experience that it's not good for us as a society, so we train them( at least in most cultures) to be kind and compassionate.
Now what is more human then- brutality or compassion? Of course compassion. It doesn't matter that this trait is not innate. What matters is that we have consciously chosen to cultivate and promote this trait. Call it "conscious" evolution, if you will. But it doesn't make us any less of a human. It makes us more human- the human that has collectively evolved using transfer of experience through language.
http://ncase.me/fireflies/