This looks to be a mapping tool rather than a full virtual tabletop. You could use this to export a map and use it with roll20 or foundry or a big printout or whatever you like.
If you are gonna go through all that work with this chip in particular, you'd probably be better off putting four of them on one board. It's all kinda moot with more powerful chips available for cheaper anyway.
This would be great. Then we could reliably use something like vault to store secrets with individual acls per-workflow, and have reasonable confidence that only that single workflow can access them.
While the current administration is turning a blind eye and I wish they wouldn't, the Russian connection here was only discovered after many layers of digging, and is still just conjecture.
After a few more iterations, they will learn how to close the gaps and be more and more untraceable. I don't know how it is possible to combat that.
"Yeah, we know it is wrong, but that single decision made 10+ years ago is too hard to change now without unknown side effects. Microsoft owns it now, so nothing too bad will happen"
Hopefully the landlords realize there is not going to be anybody lining up to take over these leases if they evict. Forgiving a couple months so a business doesn't have to close is almost certainly the shrewd business choice as well as the moral one.
There is no minimum number of missiles that must be produced no matter what. I think op was simply suggesting that fewer missiles total should be made across the board.
I've offered to pay the person who watches my dog directly, and she declines exactly because of the value add of Rover insuring her. Seems a fair model.
Kinda frustrating having certs revoked when there have never been CAA records for any names involved. I know they can't know that to be true historically, but I wish they could do some additional filtering.
Security is about being paranoid in imagining what different actors can do with varying levels of access. In this case, MITM is not always easy, but once they have access they can do bad stuff. As a webmaster, an attacker with this access can break your site by messing with your users.
By taking the simple step of using https, you can successfully reduce your attack surface and increase the difficulty of messing with your site.
That makes sense. I wonder if any web servers have smarter decision making for that. Like give a hard 301 to modern browsers, but let older or nonstandard clients get a standard http response.
It is interesting that the main argument against staying http is one of social responsibility. Your static site isn't any more susceptible to attacks with http only, but your users are. A bunch of MITM techniques are thwarted by only visiting https sites. Is that your problem as a webmaster? Since LE, I have taken up the position that it is easy, and I prefer https sites as a user, so I really don't have a good reason not to enable https.
Also, an attack on my end users is an attack on my site. Anytime someone wants to see my content and gets something else, that is bad. If I can significantly raise the difficulty of doing that, why wouldn't I?
This is a big problem for me. I will buy novelty domains on sale, then abandon them after a year because the renewal price is so much higher than the 1st year promotion. At least com and net are fairly consistent year to year.
If you do that, you quickly run into the feasible depth limit for what you can show in a fixed space. Especially for sparse trees. Consider something like family trees, where you generally don't know anything about certain lines, but may have 20 generations or more on selected lines. No way could you show 2^20 nodes in a fixed format rendering, but you can make something kinda pretty by eliminating the empty space and organizing things to fill it intelligently.
A USB bootloader and a standard footprint with a line of addon shields. 10 years ago, the only choices I saw were to buy an uno or get a pic and somehow figure out how to program it with crazy dongles and things. It was an easy choice.
How can you "refuse to pay" with uber? You have to have a card on file to order a ride. Not having a payment interaction with the driver is half the appeal.