Put two and two together, if they are saying the risk benefit from the shots is negative for children who aren’t at risk from the virus, then don’t you think the same would apply to adults who aren’t at risk from the virus?
The extent to which people seem to have given up independent thinking around this issue seems troubling.
Read between the lines because unfortunately it is highly unlikely to see politicians and public health authorities say this so bluntly when they were the ones just recently pushing these, on net deleterious shots. A sensitive issue and political minefield to say the least.
Why should people get the original shot if they haven’t already? It clearly doesn’t work, it clearly has potential for very negative side effects, and even if it did work it is designed for the original strain, which isn’t around anymore. Makes no sense…
I meant read between the lines for your own well being and that of others to see the writing on the wall of what is going on here, not as a principle for the HN style guide.
>cites population wide adherence
That is just face-saving.
“Re-vaccination” is offered not required.
It has nothing to with previous widespread injections. That had if anything negative overall effect.
More people have died from the virus after the shots than before. The shots were supposed to stop contraction of the virus, let alone dying from it.
I know it’s sucks to think about, cognitive dissonance inducing even, especially if you were gung-ho on the injection bandwagon just a year ago, but let’s face facts.
It sets a good precedent, the shots aren’t safe or effective. Does everyone have amnesia about how these things were sold? They were supposed to stop the virus cold. So much for that.
It’s a very good precedent. It wasn’t supposed to be an ongoing thing. The risk benefit just isn’t there except maybe for the most comorbid.
I don’t think the original title was misleading.
It says on the page:
Who will be offered vaccination against covid-19?
People aged 50 years and over will be offered vaccination.
People aged under 50 who are at a higher risk of becoming severely ill from covid-19 will also be offered vaccination against covid-19.
It doesn’t say people under 50 who have had 2 or fewer shots.
The comment you responded to seems to be a partial if not total fabrication.
I don’t see indication of any sort of “roll over eligibility”.
And I don’t think the official recommendation would be 2 shots for everyone since the linked page clearly states it is no longer offered for under 18s, and Søren Brostrøm, director of the health authority, saying it was a mistake to give it to any under 18s, and if you read between the lines and look at the data it was probably a mistake to give it to any under 50s.
Danish health authorities still recommend everyone to get vaccinated against COVID, including healthy people under 50. Everyone should get two jabs, everyone over 18 should get a third "booster" shot.
The vaccine talked about in the OP are the fourth vaccine jab, i.e. second booster shot, which is only offered to above-50 and people with certain heath issues.
That is not true. You just made that up didn’t you?
What is compelling you to spread misinformation?
It says this right on the linked page:
Vaccination of children against covid-19
Children and adolescents rarely become severely ill from the Omicron variant of covid-19.
From 1 July 2022, it was no longer possible for children and adolescents aged under 18 to get the first injection and, from 1 September 2022, it was no longer possible for them to get the second injection.
A very limited number of children at particularly higher risk of becoming severely ill will still be offered vaccination based on an individual assessment by a doctor.
So, no it is not recommended, because it is not even an option.
Does this sound like someone who would recommend what you said he would?
The director-general of Denmark’s Health Authority said that in retrospect injecting children with the Covid vaccine was a mistake.
Søren Brostrøm said while hosting “Go Evening Live” on TV 2: “In hindsight, we did not get much out of vaccinating the children. I want to look all parents of children who have vaccinated their child in the eye and say, ‘You did the right thing, and thank you for listening,’ ”
“But at the same time… and this is the important thing to maintain confidence… I will admit and say that we have become wiser and we would not do the same today. And we will not do that in the future either,” he added.
Christine Stabell Benn, clinical professor at the University of Southern Denmark, has long been critical of the vaccination of children. She told TV 2 that she had no doubt that the recommendation to give the Covid vaccine to the age group 12-15 was unnecessary.
“We had some vaccines with a very unknown side effect profile, and at the same time we had some children who had nothing to gain by being vaccinated,” Stabell Benn told TV 2.
The extent to which people seem to have given up independent thinking around this issue seems troubling.
Read between the lines because unfortunately it is highly unlikely to see politicians and public health authorities say this so bluntly when they were the ones just recently pushing these, on net deleterious shots. A sensitive issue and political minefield to say the least.
Why should people get the original shot if they haven’t already? It clearly doesn’t work, it clearly has potential for very negative side effects, and even if it did work it is designed for the original strain, which isn’t around anymore. Makes no sense…
I meant read between the lines for your own well being and that of others to see the writing on the wall of what is going on here, not as a principle for the HN style guide.
>cites population wide adherence
That is just face-saving.
“Re-vaccination” is offered not required. It has nothing to with previous widespread injections. That had if anything negative overall effect.
More people have died from the virus after the shots than before. The shots were supposed to stop contraction of the virus, let alone dying from it.
I know it’s sucks to think about, cognitive dissonance inducing even, especially if you were gung-ho on the injection bandwagon just a year ago, but let’s face facts.