HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

cherry_tree

no profile record

Submissions

Ask HN: Are you still using spec driven development?

6 points·by cherry_tree·5 माह पहले·7 comments

comments

cherry_tree
·11 दिन पहले·discuss
You think someone in California making 200k is paying an overall 30% in combined federal and state taxes? That seems out of touch with reality to me.
cherry_tree
·14 दिन पहले·discuss
[flagged]
cherry_tree
·15 दिन पहले·discuss
[flagged]
cherry_tree
·15 दिन पहले·discuss
[flagged]
cherry_tree
·16 दिन पहले·discuss
> In a 7-2 decision issued in June 2026, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bayer and Mosanto, ruling that the Montana state law cannot coerce the labeling of Roundup as containing carcinogens since federal regulators have not identified a connection. The ruling overturned a prior jury award and is expected to end most other ongoing litigation over Roundup.

Another anti-states right ruling that will be championed by the states rights crowd. As long as it’s in corporate interests, states have no rights.
cherry_tree
·16 दिन पहले·discuss
It seems like not quite.

The width is 50 some inches but the wheel wells are there so you may need some 2x4 or something to keep plywood from flexing over them. And the length of the bed isn’t near 8 feet so you’d need the bed open and the boards strapped in.

This jalopnik article had some helpful measurements: https://www.jalopnik.com/1845231/slate-pickup-bed-fit-every-...
cherry_tree
·17 दिन पहले·discuss
There isn’t a hatchback option. Did you mean fastback?
cherry_tree
·20 दिन पहले·discuss
Landlords typically have insurance coverage for damage by tenants, including lost rent.
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
No I think nazis killed millions of people and “woke” has done nothing remotely similar.
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
You are equating them right here. Calling them equal opposites is equating them. It implies woke is just as bad as nazi.
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
From my and seemingly others’ reading, you have equated Nazi and woke very directly in your comments. Do you feel you have you not?
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
I wasn’t asking if you agreed with the comment in question but in my statement that there is no obvious reason in the content that it should be flagged; it seems you did agree since you restored the comment. Thanks for your feedback and attention.
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
@dang can you explain how the comment below me got marked dead? How many flags did it receive? By whom? This is genuinely very concerning, this comment is not off topic or in anyway deserving to be flagged. Do you or the other moderator disagree with that statement?

Here is the text of the comment in question:

“As someone stumbling across this thread: the idea that, in regards to bias, a real person might actually consider these two events in any way comparable is honestly leaving me stunned. I can't find the right words to describe how sickening it is to see Nazism being treated as just as banally acceptable as any other political direction.”
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
[flagged]
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
Your replies are non-sequitors to the discussion in this thread.

Statement “I use grok to consume current events”

Response “grok is not a reliable source for information, especially current events or politics”

Your response “but Gemini generated images that right wingers didn’t like”

Ok? Are those images the news? Is that a way to consume current events? Do you think I’m a proponent of people using LLMs to digest current events and am only against grok specifically? What exactly is your argument against mine (that grok shouldn’t be used to consume current events). Are you agreeing? Or are you suggesting that people should use grok for current events because Gemini produced images you didn’t like?
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
I think “amount of houses” misses many important parts of how people decide where to live and what they struggle with that results in unaffordable or unavailable housing.

Where do you increase supply? The most desirable places to live like urban centers, or more likely more and wider suburbs. In a vacuum many people will say it doesn’t matter and poor people should move to where they can afford; but many people have strong connections to where they grew up and are not inclined to abandon their lifelong support systems because the pricing in one area has gone up.

How do you increase supply? Ugly 5-over-1s are cheap to make but not desirable, not particularly dense. Single family homes are even less dense. Most supply proponents are talking about these or luxury condos.

How much is the new supply? If we build new homes but they are still unattainable to the people who need them, then we didn’t help much right? Which leads me to

Who gets the new supply? Are they put on the open market for speculators/investors/landlords/private equity to gobble up or are there provisions for ensuring the housing goes to people who don’t already have housing or are physically real people not llcs etc.

Tl;dr we could build a million houses but if they are in undesirable places, unfavorable designs, or allowed to be snatched up and resold at the same high prices we already have, then supply alone wouldn’t fix unaffordability of housing across the nation.
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
[flagged]
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
[flagged]
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
[flagged]
cherry_tree
·पिछला माह·discuss
A quick google shows news articles and even videos of Ukrainian drones destroying Russian planes.