During the attack window, malicious firmware versions were distributed to users who updated their devices. This compromised firmware contained vulnerabilities that allowed unauthorized access to device functions. We have confirmed that approximately 74,00 devices received the affected firmware before our security team isolated the compromised systems.
I get that you want to be "open", but is everyone involved in these transactions ok with them being shared?
Even if they are, this doesn't seem like a good idea security wise. I see partial account numbers and other IDs/numbers that I assume you'd prefer not be public, regardless of how insensitive they may seem now.
EXPENSIFY, INC. VALIDATION XXXXXX5987 THE HACK FOUNDATION
+$0.89
FRONTING $10,000 TO CHRIS WALKER FOR GITHUB GRANTS MADE FROM PERSONAL ACCOUNT
-$10,000.00
This isn't the first time an article is also marketing. Besides, what is wrong with marketing something via a use case article?
This is a fairly tame example of it and I found it an interesting and useful read, knowing full well it was also marketing.
I did a lot of testing with Krea. The results were certainly very different than flux-dev, less "ai-like" in some ways and the details were way better, but very soft and bit washed out and more ai-like in other ways.
I did a 50% mix of flux-dev-krea and flux-dev and it is my new favorite base model.