it's pretty funny that you revisionist history mormon apologists will claim that his 1826 trial records are fake, but think gold tablets sent by angels and never seen by anyone are real. that's super consistent.
the fact that a multinational organization with revenues in the billions can do SEO is not at all impressive to me.
furthermore, you really need to question your belief system and analytical processes if you follow a church founded by a guy who thought he could find treasure by looking at a rock in a hat (he was also a convicted fraudster).
and out comes mongo's dirty little secret - you have to have enough ram in your boxes to hold not just all the data in ram, but all the indexes too, or it completely shits the bed.
putting hundreds of gigs of ram in a box isn't cheap.
are the foursquare folks considering rewriting with a traditional datastore like postgres and some memcached in front of it?
i'd argue that almost everything done online (posting to twitter, writing a blog, and yes posting comments here, updating facebook) is done primarily to show off, garner attention, feel important, show people how gosh darn smart you are, etc.
anybody who disagrees with this just wants even more attention.
I can't wait for Obie's next book, "The Jails Way"
seriously though, if you associate and start businesses with people who send fake invoices for deceptive services like this, you are probably a sleazeball.
even if you do have glamour shots of yourself all over your webpage.
this article's entire argument seems to be based around the idea that people only use twitter to broadcast mundane personal updates. that would get old very fast.
5 seconds of actual "journalism" would have evaporated this premise pretty quickly.
but hey, why actually try something out when you can just write a crappy fluff piece based on your preconceptions?
I'd argue that you are, and you have some extremely revealing hang-ups about sex and sexuality, as evidenced by your reaction to a freaking cartoon avatar ("make me, personally, uncomfortable about working there, or talking to anyone who worked there") and the "what will we tell our parents?" line.
how about you tell them "hey parents, i'm a grown-ass man capable of making my own decisions without being afraid of what my PARENTS will think!!"
our economy borrows against future real growth to finance itself, and that will never work in the long term - that real growth is physically constrained, but the debt is not.
just look at our national debt - our economy will never grow fast enough in real wealth terms to be able to pay back the debt that is accumulating much faster. debt is just a number on paper, without bound. growth has to contend with the real world.
The per-capita deficit isn't really that meaningful. $1000 a person isn't even that much - each citizen of the USA would have to pay $35,462.89 to cancel out the country's national debt. the reason it's not a problem is because our national debt is only like 75% of GDP. comparatively, California's deficit of $41 billion is only 2.4% of their GDP. it's a little different because California can't print money, but nothing to get all armageddon-y about. raise some taxes, decrease some spending, seize some swiss bank accounts and call it a day.
another point of comparison - we've already given way more than $41 billion to SINGLE corporations like AIG, not to mention bank of america, citi, fannie, freddie, etc. personally, i'd much rather bail out states than corporations. spending money on teachers - the horror!!
guy gets stock options, but only if he agrees to work there full-time?!?
does anyone else see the ridiculousness in joel's proposal? no wonder the dude walked - that is a horrible deal. anyone in that position could now assume that any future huge contributions to the company would be rewarded in an equally miserly way. joel should have given him the shares outright - otherwise they're not a reward.
and joel should be freakin embarrassed to even be telling this story - what a crook.
the truth hurts i guess.
it's pretty funny that you revisionist history mormon apologists will claim that his 1826 trial records are fake, but think gold tablets sent by angels and never seen by anyone are real. that's super consistent.