Which syntax sugar do you think verbose? I don't think Egison has lots of syntax sugar.
Egison features a customizable pattern-matching facility.
Pattern-matching methods for each data type and pattern can be customizable by users.
There might be a possibility that you thought syntax sugar is not syntax sugar.
The calculus for differential forms is a part of Geometric algebra, so I think there is a relation.
Egison's strong point is it can handle tensor-valued p-forms due to its ability to handle both of tensor index notation and differential forms at the same time.
Egison features a customizable pattern-matching facility. Pattern-matching methods for each data type and pattern can be customizable by users. There might be a possibility that you thought syntax sugar is not syntax sugar.