Dr. Asperger may or may not have been sorting autistic children into high- and low-functioning groups so that the higher group (with “Asperger’s”) could go on to become good Nazis and the lower group could be euthanized.
YMMV, I guess - we were surprised when our first grader said math was her favorite part of school this year, and she recently asked if she can get i-Ready on her iPad.
It's insane to me that this even needs to be written – showing you care is just not that hard! And it absolutely doesn't have to come at the expense of business goals.
I've had some amount of success running a startup, and honestly the only thing that reliably paid off was hiring great (i.e., smart, thoughtful, kind) people and treating them like family.
All obviously true, but what I don’t understand is how anyone could possibly believe that this strike could push Iran toward signing and abiding by the terms of an agreement more stringent than JCPOA. I’d be very happy to be wrong but it’s hard for me to see how this isn’t a big step backward.
It’s an interesting question. The shares are likely not transferrable without amending the LLC agreement or whatever. If you want in on Anthropic, though, and you know the FTX estate has to liquidate, then there’s a chance you can get to a good price; maybe less than $3B but probably not a ton, because lots of other people want in too.
On the other hand, the current investors probably won’t want to make an exception for FTX if they know it’s going to cause them to write down their stakes.
Also, to be clear, it will eventually stack up and roughly even out as you amortize 1/5 of each of 5 years’ worth of R&D spend per year. Basically the part that sucks is that there was no 4-year phase-in period.
Weird how this works sometimes… I was just at the Monterey Bay Aquarium for the first time today, saw the name on the auditorium and thought “that Gordon (and Betty) Moore?”
Truly an incredible place, and thanks in very large part to the Moores. RIP Gordon.
I mean, most MCUs are already 15+ years behind the state of the art process node and are still supply constrained. The issue, I think, is that once these market conditions are resolved, any new fabs will have ~zero value, and there is a non-zero chance that your shiny new-old fab comes online after the shortage is over. Not an easy sell to shareholders I suspect.
They mention a “very conservative false positive rate” - doesn’t 1/trillion imply that they used 1 / (1e12 ^ (1/30)) = ~40% as the false positive rate? If so, that does seem extremely conservative to me!
YES! It always seems like people’s issues are handwaved away with something like “oh you just need to understand the underlying data structures better.” No, the UX is often very bad! Like, I know exactly what I want the underlying repo to do, but how the hell am I supposed to remember which —-option of which command is going to do that thing?