The quick answer is that even in the workflow described by the author these tools don’t do the same thing AI does. And a good programmer/agent will be using these tools as well
Having read this whole conversation (much like one feels the need to stare at a car accident), you sound truly insane. I hope that’s you were aiming for, otherwise you really need help
I wonder what’s the difference between countries that drives that. It’s not like Brazil doesn’t have its own FDA, which is much more strict than the US one, from what I know. Maybe some kind of lobbying? Or are animal rights group that much stronger?
My interface with code is definitely not my eyes. My interface with code is the mental structures I keep in my mind while coding. Rust is perfectly legible, even better than legible, because all the structures in my mind can be simpler since the language guarantees so much on its own. Something as superficial as wether the language uses :: or whatever doesn’t even register while I’m programming.
Also, that was a nonsense metaphor for you to use. The grip being slippery is so far removed from “beauty” that not even trying to change the subject to be about “interfacing” can redeem it.
C++ is a slippery hammer, not because it’s ugly, but because it’s easy to hit yourself in the foot using it.
I care about how nice my tools are as well, but notice "nice" implies usefulness. Beauty? beauty is irrelevant, and it is irrelevant in many human endeavors where it is not treated as such.
I find caring about a language being “ugly” such a weird concept. Like, imagine caring that a hammer is pretty or not… All I care about is how well it can hammer my nails and that’s literally it.