Modern JS frameworks can absolutely catch and isolate errors.
In those cases you’d only see the error in the specific component that had the error.
Or if they’re a good dev you as a user won’t even know! You’ll see fallback content.
An error blocking the full screen is a failure on the developer not the tools.
First off, It’s good to study all kinds of things isn’t it? Even if it’s not strictly practical.
Second, and more importantly these AI tools are EVERYWHERE right now. The effects of people using them for work can be seen throughout many industries and workplaces.
So I think studying how these models perform in the vast majority of use cases is not only a good idea, but it’s actually really important.
Even if you’re strictly pro-AI and believe it is the future, a study like this can help you explain to laymen why they need the harnesses you’re so in support of.
But actually creating music or playing an instrument is much more rewarding. The time commitment is part of it, the journey is the destination and all that.
They can’t even deliver their own flagship products without bugs, and terrible UX. So I’m doubtful of their abilities.
These are also the same companies allowing their AI to make decisions in war, have no qualms about the mental issues they’re causing in people, and have abused workers in 3rd world countries for years.
But you think they’re holding out on “destroying the software industry” out of the goodness of their hearts? Come on
I don’t see how you could assume the likes of Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, and even Anthropic with all their virtue signaling (for lack of a better term) are motivated by anything other than greed.
An error blocking the full screen is a failure on the developer not the tools.