Yes, things have bugs and design flaws. No, your painfully unoriginal caterwauling about how much you're pretend it vexes you does not make you interesting or intelligent.
The problem with this corporatist neoleftist thinking is that "the west" are the victims too. Thousands and thousands of people in "the west" were killed or horribly damaged by the war. And they were forced to pay trillions of dollars for it. And like clockwork, the elites will tell those people they are to blame for it, they must pay reparations, they must bear more burden of taking refugees, etc.
The actual people who should pay reparations are the war profiteers and those who lied and committed crimes to start these wars.
Only under neoleftism could addicted victims of these violent destructive drug pushing cartels be considered to be supporters of the cartels, and not the cartels or the people or governments of the countries they flourish under.
I don't know how you're defining simplicity but the integer promotion rules are not complex at all, I would call them very simple.
The problem with them is not the complexity, it's that they work fine most of the time so many people don't learn them or are not looking out for bugs with them.
> But Sanders has been far more forthright in his opposition to the super-wealthy, categorically stating, “billionaires should not exist.”
I have to laugh at this hateful hypocrite. Bernie Sanders is super-wealthy, and unimaginably privileged. It's funny, before he became a multi millionaire himself, his signature was to fight against "the millionaires and billionaires". As he approached the millionaire net worth figure, that quietly changed to "billionaires". He derided people who asked about that, and said they should, to paraphase, "just be successful" if they wanted to be wealthy like him.
Goes to show you it was never about principle or altruism, it is greed and divisiveness for the sake of power and wealth. Faux generosity at its finest.
The moral of the story is that all humans suffer the human condition. Believing in saints is one thing, believing that these secular-saints are everywhere, especially the ones who talk the most on twitter or get praised the most by global media corporations, is stupid. People should not get so much trust and admiration from the cheap words they say.
These are semantics, the concept of zero is still obviously everywhere in nature.
"How many fish have you caught?" "None."
Just because you reply none doesn't make it some wildly different concept than if you had replied with the word zero. In fact it's exactly the same thing.
It was always credible. The title should read, "How the neoliberal corporatists decided their propaganda machines should change their position on the issue"?
Just 4% of India's workforce is white collar? Incredible statistic when you think of all the skilled professionals from that country. This globalist neocolonialial hell sure has a lot to answer for.
If the consequences of peoples' actions are externalized, if they are relieved of any responsibility to provide for themselves, and if they are brainwashed from birth into believing that they can't help themselves but all their fortune is determined by the prejudice or benevolence of other races or classes of people, the results are not slightly surprising to anyone with a vague grasp of human nature.
I can't keep up, is Fauci still a high priest of the grotesque cult of corporate leftism, or has he fallen from grace? Before making a comment on the topic I need to know if he is still one who must not be questioned so I don't accidentally commit secular-heresy.
The communist party has conspired to cover up worse, genocides perpetuated by their dictatorship for example. The people who claim it's an outlandish suggestion they might have covered up a lab leak are uninformed or CCP apologists.
It would not be in the least surprising if this was a lab leak, and it is no more "harmful" to speculate that it was than to speculate that it was a wild virus.
Certain types of people are treated as beyond criticism, and anyone suspecting they might be subject to the human condition is a heretic and conspiracy theorist.
Well said. HN likes to think of itself as a paragon of virtue and goodness, but it's a thinly layered veneer on top of a lot of bullying, nastiness, envy, and hate and fear of the unknown and those who are different.
Your reasonable live and let live comments are downvoted, while the absolutely pointless and off-topic empty vitriol bullying some completely unrelated people in a topic supposed to be about a scientific discovery is not. Amazing.
Not sure if you're editing your comment or I didn't read it entirely before.
And your last sentence is not some kind of proof of your belief. Without a dirty cheap producer then a cleaner producer who has paid for the environmental externalities they created might have made the product.
I could well be wrong, sorry I should not have tried to make such a strong statement I don't actually have much knowledge of recent technology nodes.
In your first link I'm struggling to see it demonstrate what you say. Actually that's more what I'm familiar with.
Obviously it's quite old though. The second link does seem to show the trend going to equipment costs and trending upward indeed. Although it doesn't seem very detailed, I suppose that first graph on the left on page 9 looks like mostly fixed costs in orange. Thanks for the link.
Yes, things have bugs and design flaws. No, your painfully unoriginal caterwauling about how much you're pretend it vexes you does not make you interesting or intelligent.