HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

tim_hutton

no profile record

comments

tim_hutton
·2 वर्ष पहले·discuss
Two orbital things we might look for:

1. Activity in geostationary orbits.

2. Orbits where the planet's year is exactly divisible by its day, eliminating leap years.
tim_hutton
·3 वर्ष पहले·discuss
Fredkin’s Self-Replicating Cellular Automata:

Sum the neighbors, modulo 2, and assign to the cell on the next timestep.

Astonishingly this allows patterns to replicate in multiple directions across the plane. https://cellpylib.org/fredkin.html

Works with any kind of lattice. Even works in 3D.
tim_hutton
·3 वर्ष पहले·discuss
"According to biographer Robert Wright, the character Stephen Falken in the film WarGames was modeled after Fredkin." [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Fredkin]
tim_hutton
·3 वर्ष पहले·discuss
Did you know, cats are believed to be the only mammals that don't taste sweetness! To unsubscribe at any time, reply STOP to this message.
tim_hutton
·3 वर्ष पहले·discuss
Sandy Crush
tim_hutton
·3 वर्ष पहले·discuss
The only was I can remember which is port and starboard is by thinking about boarding an airplane. The steps/tunnel are always docked on the 'port' side, just as boats always dock on the port side. The cockpit/bow is always on your left when you board.
tim_hutton
·3 वर्ष पहले·discuss
Not hidden in the knitting in the sense of the specific stitches (which is also very cool: https://www.popsci.com/story/diy/secret-code-messages-knitti...) but it seems she needed the knitting needle to insert the one-time codes (on a piece of silk) into a shoelace. Amazing story.
tim_hutton
·4 वर्ष पहले·discuss
One route to understanding how CPUs work is to explore the computers that have been made in cellular automata. Golly (https://golly.sourceforge.net/) has several, including one by John von Neumann, one by Edgar Codd and another by John Devore. The advantage of course is that the physics is trivial and you can see everything that happens and step backwards and forwards.

Example:

https://timhutton.github.io/2010/03/10/30984.html

https://github.com/GollyGang/ruletablerepository/wiki/CoddsD...
tim_hutton
·4 वर्ष पहले·discuss
I'm very skeptical of hydrogen as a general solution for reducing carbon emissions. It feels like greenwashing.

"As of 2020, the majority of hydrogen (∼95%) is produced from fossil fuels" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_production

Producing "green hydrogen" is much more expensive: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_hydrogen
tim_hutton
·4 वर्ष पहले·discuss
If this is true then Haskell's type system is Noether's Theorem.
tim_hutton
·4 वर्ष पहले·discuss
This is an excellent app, it works very well. Thanks for linking.
tim_hutton
·4 वर्ष पहले·discuss
> "02016"

Thank you for preparing for the Y10K problem.
tim_hutton
·4 वर्ष पहले·discuss
I need this for my Android phone to compensate for a burnt-in image.
tim_hutton
·4 वर्ष पहले·discuss
"the sensation they are experiencing is not being cancelled but merely going out of fashion" - https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/aug/14/terry-...
tim_hutton
·4 वर्ष पहले·discuss
As a Golly file, so you can run it for yourself: https://github.com/GollyGang/ruletablerepository/raw/gh-page... (4kB)

In Golly: File > Open Pattern... > open the zip itself (don't unzip first).
tim_hutton
·5 वर्ष पहले·discuss
Gödel's incompleteness isn't a practical obstacle to proof assistants - it will never stop us formalizing proofs and searching for new theorems. It's irrelevant to their operation and will continue to be for all time.

If Gödel's incompleteness applies to the theorem you are trying to prove then it means that the theorem has been very carefully set up with reference to the axioms that you are using in order to be unprovable. It's not something you will stumble across otherwise.

Think of it like this: imagine knowing that maths will stop working if a certain very specific enormous number appears in your calculation. This would keep mathematicians up at night with worry but it would have no practical effect on anyone else because the enormous number simply never appears.