Police spread falsehoods after using deadly force, analysis finds(theguardian.com)

18 pointsby pmoriarty5 tahun yang lalu3 comments

Police spread falsehoods after using deadly force, analysis finds

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/19/us-police-shootings-george-floyd-press-releases-reports

3 comments

anigbrowl5 tahun yang lalu

Police in other rich countries are much more circumspect about their allegations, not least to avoid prejudicing the outcome of a trial. Of course, this can often lead to stonewalling where little or no information is released at all, but in most jurisdictions police killings are rare and subject to correspondingly greater levels of public scrutiny.

In my view, false information put out by police should be prosecuted as strict liability obstruction of justice, whether misinformation (accidental or negligent falsehood) or disinformation (deliberate untruth). Where the latter is established, liability must include the chain of command and should be prosecuted on a conspiracy basis.

evilpotatoes5 tahun yang lalu

neat, any analysis of how often the guardian tells the same lies of omission ?

anigbrowl5 tahun yang lalu

Can't recall the Guardian killing anyone, but perhaps you can undertake a search for how often they've been sued for libel. That'd be better than just insinuating that they've done equivalently bad things, without offering any evidence.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html